Replies

“something else ....why call people “Obots” if they dont buy Smith and his magic Kenyan paper?”

I called “an Obot” the person who corrupted the Wiki date format page to remove proof that Kenya used two date formats, one of which matched the CPGH BC. He/she is an Obama operative robot, i.e. Obot, IMO.

I have no complaint about folks who disagree with me, other than concern trolls who lurk on eligibility threads and want to “help” others see that the troll knows the truth and others don't.

I remain agnostic regarding the CPGH BC absent forensic examination or proof of forgery which I don't see, yet.

Note that several months ago LDS claimed that he had been offered a much higher resolution scan of a CPGH BC and he was in some kind of negotiations to obtain it, IIRC.

He posted a partial scan that included part of the footprint and parts of several signatures that were identical to the LDS scan...but where, in fact, at much higher resolution. The little folds and grooves of the footprint were much clearer and more suitable for ID, should that be possible.

I wasn't following site very closely and I have heard no word that LDS obtained the better scan or that the full scan was ever put up anywhere, but that might just be the scan the triggered this thread...before it disappeared!

Here's another guess: The scan came from Odinga's top aide and is now in the possession of Jerome Corsi...and maybe Arpaio's Posse, now that you mention it. Arpaio has been extremely careful not to reveal anything too soon. Arpaio would know that an alleged CPGH BC scan or actual embossed certificate can ONLY be authenticated by the corrupt Kenyan government in order to be entered into evidence in federal court and Obama can outbid anybody to bribe the Kenyans to hide or reveal it. Leaking a high quality scan onto the web briefly could be a warning to Barry's team of things to come.

Catching up with the thread and the links at the site at the top of the thread it appears that the image being discussed is the same one from several years ago and not the newer higher resolution scan that was partially disclosed by LDS several months back...perhaps because that was all that the seller was willing to show him.

Looking at the immigration case up-thread where an ID was made of an adult using a baby footprint, I think it is possible that an ID could be made of Obama’s foot using the newer higher resolution scan of the CPGH BC (not likely a print could be obtained without warrant).