Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Danae
this is not meant to be a provocative question.

how many jane and john does do you think read u.s. supreme court cases they find on google? i know there are more jane and john does than attorneys, but it seems that the relevant number is the number who google u.s. supreme court cases and read them.

in your circle of friends, how many of them google and read u.s. supreme court opinions. of that group, how many then check to see if the opinion has been cited, and read those citing cases?

do the jane and john does you know do that in any meaningful numbers?

that's a question, and not meant as an argument.

222 posted on 03/16/2012 6:29:15 PM PDT by Scoutmaster (You knew the job was dangerous when you took it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies ]


To: Scoutmaster

I cannot of course answer that question with any specificity. I do know there were at the very least, hundreds who were looking up SCOTUS law in the fall of 2008 after Leo Donofrio discovered Chester Arthur’s father was not a Naturalized Citizen until 14 years after Chester’s Birth. Leo was the first I knew of who was looking into Minor v Happersett. I looked, I could not find anything on it. I gave up thinking it was irrelevant, and being more or less ignorant of just how smart Leo was. There were more than a few. It is impossible to say.


224 posted on 03/16/2012 7:18:06 PM PDT by Danae (Anail nathrach, ortha bhais is beatha, do cheal deanaimh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson