Man, my reply stands on it's own. I'm not insinuating anything. Does it look like I've got a problem speaking my concerns? I don't think so.
I'll give anyone the benefit of the doubt.
I've got no problem with you so far other than that, IMO, you might need a little directional mental push to get you to look at things differently. You seemed to have taken what I said seriously.
As I said, in the end, time will tell and your words will speak volumes.
Have fun, Ray. C ya around.
I could never associate with Harlan for at least two reasons.
1) His argument was not premised upon principle, merely an outcome. People might disagree, but at least have a principle to defend.
2) The apparent goal was the acceptance of the subordination of our Law to Obama’s will.
Until we meet again.