Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: philman_36

Showing the BC would not have changed the possible negative outcomes - he would have been off the ballot regardless.

He was off the ballot until the plaintiffs opened their mouths.

Accepting a default judgement means there is no hearing, which means there is no requirement to produce evidence. Which means there was no evidence to conceal. I don’t think any court in the land would say that “I am guilty” could be construed as an attempt to conceal evidence.


375 posted on 03/08/2012 8:54:15 AM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies ]


To: Harlan1196
Showing the BC would not have changed the possible negative outcomes...
I don't see how you could know that so I'll chalk that up to your stating your opinion.
...he would have been off the ballot regardless.

Again, I don't see how you could know that so I'll chalk that up to your stating your opinion.

He was off the ballot until the plaintiffs opened their mouths.
How do you know that? Silence got them nothing and Malihi could have ruled any way he chose, as is evident.

377 posted on 03/08/2012 9:04:08 AM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 375 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson