If Obama was required to submit a BC in a legal proceeding, he would not use an electronic copy. Hawaii would simply send the court a certified copy of the COLB and that would be that.
Obama send Kent those BCs as a political message - he had no legal requirement to give Kemp anything.
It was a sharp, hard knock on Kemp’s forehead to focus him on what he was getting himself into if he backed the birthers.
Birthers have this fantasy that if they could only get Obama’s BC into court, it would be exposed as a forgery and and that Hawaiian corruption would be revealed.
Obama reminded Kemp that if push came to shove in a court of law, Hawaii would simply send the court a certified copy of the COLB and the court would accept without question. Kemp is no fool.
Obama send Kent those BCs as a political message - he had no legal requirement to give Kemp anything.
It was a sharp, hard knock on Kemp’s forehead to focus him on what he was getting himself into if he backed the birthers.
Birthers have this fantasy that if they could only get Obama’s BC into court, it would be exposed as a forgery and and that Hawaiian corruption would be revealed.
Obama reminded Kemp that if push came to shove in a court of law, Hawaii would simply send the court a certified copy of the COLB and the court would accept without question. Kemp is no fool.
Hitler's brown shirts twisted arms to get people to do what they wanted. I think Obama and his forces are the modern embodiment of the same.
I believe Obama's long form is a "legal forgery" created by DOH under Court Order to create a replacement birth certificate designed to look like an original. I don't see how his lawyers would accept being involved in anything which they knew to be illegal, and that might eventually get discovered.
Circumstantial evidence indicates Obama was adopted twice, and it makes it highly likely that his original was sealed and that he was issued a new document by Court Order.
I find this possibility highly persuasive because the same thing happened to me. *I* am adopted, and *I* have a replacement birth certificate.
Hawaii would simply send the court a certified copy of the COLB and that would be that.
It wasn't Hawaii's responsibility to send anything in. It was the defendant's responsibility to appear with it and he didn't.
Obama send Kent those BCs as a political message...
Isn't that against the law?
...he had no legal requirement to give Kemp anything.
So why did Jablonski send them to Kemp instead of showing up in court as ordered with the required objects?
It was a sharp, hard knock on Kemp’s forehead to focus him on what he was getting himself into if he backed the birthers.
You don't seem to have a problem with the coercion of public officials.
Birthers have this fantasy that if they could only get Obama’s BC into court, it would be exposed as a forgery and and that Hawaiian corruption would be revealed.
It figures that you would have such a jaundiced view of the issue. Thanks for sharing it.
Obama reminded Kemp that if push came to shove in a court of law, Hawaii would simply send the court a certified copy of the COLB and the court would accept without question. Kemp is no fool.
Again, you don't seem to understand...the Defendant was ordered to appear with the required objects. The State of Hawaii had no obligations placed upon it.
Is today a day off for the Harlan of yesterday?