I find this item particularly interesting:
Finally, the microfilm issue highlighted in the Sheriff Arpaio press conference.
One of the questions investigated by the Cold Case Posse revolved around possible entry into the U.S. by Obama’s mother. Anyone entering the United States, citizen or foreigner, is required to fill out an official card through INS.
It is thought that, sometime within the first week of August 1961, Stanley Ann Dunham may have entered the United States from overseas bringing with her, a baby. Suspiciously missing from the INS records thus far investigated was that very week. Microfilm reel #184 shows only a couple of cards before that reel goes blank. Reel #185 picks up with August 8th 1961. Missing completely are August 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th, 1961.
1) When did that week’s record go missing?
2) Who removed that week’s record?
3) Why is it missing?
At this point, we have no idea when that single week’s portion of the INS microfilm record went missing. As to who was responsible, we can only guess it rises to a higher level than the DNC. While it would be relatively simple for the DNC to create forged documents to stand in for nonexistent documents, the INS is a federal bureau and missing records are far different from records which never existed...
(IMO he’s being kind to the myth, assuming the ‘removed’ record might be an entry into the US by Stanley Ann Dunham and a newborn...the age of the child isn’t governed by its arrival in the US, and the identity of the mother hasn’t been proven by any means...that I can see.)
.
Maybe the records are missing because Stanley Ann was accompanied by a two year old boy, instead of the mythical infant.
Interesting....coming to the full circle?
We had a lot of discussions here on the subject, by boat or by plane. SAD’s daddy at the dock, etc.??
We also had a guy exposing so much evidence in text, graphics and picture, but never seen him posting further since at least a year ago???
Fred,
I was thinking of all the other folks that came into the us during that same time period.
Was wondering if they tried to get their records and couldn’t, on account of the ‘scrubbing’.
Would they have any legal recourse, class action suit, or something?
They’d certainly be an injured party.... maybe even have standing...
This thing is indeed larger than Watergate...
Brennan work ... and I don’t mean Walter Brennan. If Sandy Burglar can steal documents from the Archives without real punishment, imagine what Brennan has done and will never be indicted for any of it! There may even be wet work in the list.