So Dan Rather was convicted in court? A real court accepted those “facts” into official evidence? I don’t even remember Dan Rather being charged with a crime.
I thought you wanted to get Obama into court. Don’t you think you need to have evidence that would actually be accepted as probative evidence?
you made a false statement I corrected you. as for document examiners examining the “doc” for the Cold Case Posse, see 34 minutes to 35 minutes into video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JPabF7yd7kk&feature=youtu.be
WHY won’t Obama allow anyone to see his original BC? Answer that if the copy is the same why not the original?