Oh, I see.
You will not separate the facts from those involved with the facts.
By the way, let's let a real judge and jury decide when this reaches a real court, which it has not yet.
Until then, it is pointless specualtion on your part about what may or may not be true about the participants.
So, now, what do you think about the facts, on their own, because I do not share your assertion that they are in any way tainted.
I understand that nothing that investigation presented would ever be allowed in court.
If it is not legally admissible as evidence, then legally it is nothing more than unsubstantiated hearsay.
I will pay attention the day Sheriff Joe says “I have ordered an official criminal investigation.” That is the kind of investigation that discovers the truth - impartial investigators with the power to compel testimony and evidence.
I think the facts are simply Corsi’s birther nonsense recycled once again.