That would mean the alteration would have had to have been done by the WH, and the State of Hawaii is party to the crime by tacitly validating it (failing to blow the whistle).
Pretty neat if the Sheriff can prove that! He'd have to persuade a court with proper jurisdiction to subpoena the Hawaii original and call the Hawaii officials as witnesses. And, of course, the evidence, once dragged into court, would have to prove the case. Maybe if he can get Arizona to deny Zero ballot access, he can bump the case into federal court and persuade a judge to do the above. Don't hold your breath.
Apollo:”It could not have been digitally altered from Hawaii, and then printed, redigitized, printed, and digitized again, because the act of printing and then taking a photocopy of the image (as they claimed they did) would have eliminated any artifact that pointed to intentional editing.”
cynwoody, after reflecting on this and your assumed order of events, I don’t know that I agree with your assumptions. You are proposing that Hawaii provided paper copies of the birth certificate, these were sent/carried to the White House, scanned and then modified and then reprinted.
I propose that maybe we were misinformed somewhat along the way (perhaps lied to?) and that Hawaii supplied the Obama folks with a digital copy of the certificate with the paper copies. There are two reasons I consider this likely. First off, wouldn’t the computers in the White House be more secure than most and wouldn’t it be unlikely that Sheriff Joe could gather the source of the document from something generated in the White House. It’s more probable that the work was done on less secure equipment such as what Hawaii might use. Secondly, Sheriff Joe mentioned at the end of the press conference he thought an investigation in Hawaii was one option. If he suspected the White House modified the LFBC, why would he recommend an investigation in Hawaii?
As you have posted in other threads, I think Hawaii is complicit in this cover-up (and have been for some time) and that the real birth documents need to be brought forward - IF they actually exist...
Apollo:”It could not have been digitally altered from Hawaii, and then printed, redigitized, printed, and digitized again, because the act of printing and then taking a photocopy of the image (as they claimed they did) would have eliminated any artifact that pointed to intentional editing.”
cynwoody, after reflecting on this and your assumed order of events, I don’t know that I agree with your assumptions. You are proposing that Hawaii provided paper copies of the birth certificate, these were sent/carried to the White House, scanned and then modified and then reprinted.
I propose that maybe we were misinformed somewhat along the way (perhaps lied to?) and that Hawaii supplied the Obama folks with a digital copy of the certificate with the paper copies. There are two reasons I consider this likely. First off, wouldn’t the computers in the White House be more secure than most and wouldn’t it be unlikely that Sheriff Joe could gather the source of the document from something generated in the White House. It’s more probable that the work was done on less secure equipment such as what Hawaii might use. Secondly, Sheriff Joe mentioned at the end of the press conference he thought an investigation in Hawaii was one option. If he suspected the White House modified the LFBC, why would he recommend an investigation in Hawaii?
As you have posted in other threads, I think Hawaii is complicit in this cover-up (and have been for some time) and that the real birth documents need to be brought forward - IF they actually exist...
Apollo:”It could not have been digitally altered from Hawaii, and then printed, redigitized, printed, and digitized again, because the act of printing and then taking a photocopy of the image (as they claimed they did) would have eliminated any artifact that pointed to intentional editing.”
cynwoody, after reflecting on this and your assumed order of events, I don’t know that I agree with your assumptions. You are proposing that Hawaii provided paper copies of the birth certificate, these were sent/carried to the White House, scanned and then modified and then reprinted.
I propose that maybe we were misinformed somewhat along the way (perhaps lied to?) and that Hawaii supplied the Obama folks with a digital copy of the certificate with the paper copies. There are two reasons I consider this likely. First off, wouldn’t the computers in the White House be more secure than most and wouldn’t it be unlikely that Sheriff Joe could gather the source of the document from something generated in the White House. It’s more probable that the work was done on less secure equipment such as what Hawaii might use. Secondly, Sheriff Joe mentioned at the end of the press conference he thought an investigation in Hawaii was one option. If he suspected the White House modified the LFBC, why would he recommend an investigation in Hawaii?
As you have posted in other threads, I think Hawaii is complicit in this cover-up (and have been for some time) and that the real birth documents need to be brought forward - IF they actually exist...
Apollo:”It could not have been digitally altered from Hawaii, and then printed, redigitized, printed, and digitized again, because the act of printing and then taking a photocopy of the image (as they claimed they did) would have eliminated any artifact that pointed to intentional editing.”
cynwoody, after reflecting on this and your assumed order of events, I don’t know that I agree with your assumptions. You are proposing that Hawaii provided paper copies of the birth certificate, these were sent/carried to the White House, scanned and then modified and then reprinted.
I propose that maybe we were misinformed somewhat along the way (perhaps lied to?) and that Hawaii supplied the Obama folks with a digital copy of the certificate with the paper copies. There are two reasons I consider this likely. First off, wouldn’t the computers in the White House be more secure than most and wouldn’t it be unlikely that Sheriff Joe could gather the source of the document from something generated in the White House. It’s more probable that the work was done on less secure equipment such as what Hawaii might use. Secondly, Sheriff Joe mentioned at the end of the press conference he thought an investigation in Hawaii was one option. If he suspected the White House modified the LFBC, why would he recommend an investigation in Hawaii?
As you have posted in other threads, I think Hawaii is complicit in this cover-up (and have been for some time) and that the real birth documents need to be brought forward - IF they actually exist...