All I am trying to say is, beware the theories that present an answer to everything - and don’t throw out suggestions that seem a little out of left field. No one person will ever close the book on this, imo.
It’s going to take teamwork, and the sheriff has a team.
I applaud his teams work. They did come up with a few new things of which I had not heard. I would just like to know that they have looked at this issue from the perspective i've mentioned in this thread.
If they have considered the possibility that the document is a forgery produced by the Department of Health in Hawaii as a replacement document due to an Adoption or an Annulled Adoption, then that is all that I can ask.
If they have considered the idea and dismissed it for good cause, then my concern will have been addressed. I just don't think they have considered the idea. A lot of people seem to think it is far fetched, yet it seems to me the simplest was to explain stuff that doesn't make sense otherwise.
In all honesty, I posted this thread in the hopes that someone could get the idea to the posse just to make sure they have considered it.