Posted on 03/01/2012 12:55:37 PM PST by geraldmcg
In Adobe you just flatten the layer to create the image. They just posted the wrong version on wh.gov...
Most of us with 10 minutes experience in Adobe knew the BC was a forgery it was obvious.
Just an example of the hubris we are witnessing first-hand.
And the big question is: Will Fox and Hannity report this as serious news?
Answer: I doubt it.
I was wondering if Sean was worried about getting whacked. Then I realized he doesn’t have to worry as long as he hangs out with his “good friend” Al Sharpton.
Wow. That one flew right over my head! I am giving myself a time-out for missing that.
Exactly, they will keep ignoring hoping it doesn’t have legs.
I will agree and sign on with that acknowledgement to Sheriff Arpaio - Amen
We will find out tonight.
We will find out tonight.
He don’t need Stauffenberg but he has a whole lot of guys like him.
Since we're all just speculating here, let me join by asking, "Who would be both capable & willing to produce a forged 'original' that would pass muster?" These clowns can't even get a passable scanned file to pass the smell-test.
Anybody capable of doing such a forgery would have to be willing to keep his mouth shut and risk that the president would sick the long arm of the goverment at him once the deed was done. This is "Day of the Jackal" stuff.
Nooo, he spends millions to clean up archives and scare judges and talking heads
bumpity-ping
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHAM3hRI8_Y&feature=player_embedded
The video on the SS forgery was the best thing they presented.
BUSTED!
I was somewhat disappointed by the presentation. I have in my possession copies of documents that show what was presented with very similar analysis. The real importance of Arpaio’s is the facts are now very public just not internet talk. I was disappointed in that Arpaio did not to my expectations come flat out and say exactly how the crime, and why it was a crime, affected the people of Arizona. He could not/would not even say that that a person with false birth credentials could not be on the ballot in Arizona for POTUSA. I did sense that the presentation said Obama could have been born anywhere. That data/info could not be found as to circa 1961 air flights to and from Kenya is not surprising. My take from the internet when this Kenya aspect surfaced years ago does have reference to people and times and other info and I think the investigation was lax in not doing an historical search of the internet. Perhaps they did but believed they had to use current available documentation for their case. A lesson that should be well known by this time is that Obama and his enablers will not let any grass grow under their feet to destroy any implicating evidence/records. I was left with a feeling that even Arpaio and his posse realize this matter is far more involved/bigger than people can imagine. Looking at some events in centuries old history will show this such can occur. I suspect as much for the USA today. Hopefully all can be reversed.
Just because people are Evil doesn’t mean they are Geniuses.
Fake but also accurate? Upon WHAT would you base that hypothesis? What would be the motive to create FAKE but accurate documents? It’s still fraud if they’re “fake” but presented as real certified documents from Hawaii. They’re not fake but accurate. Something on it is bogus. That’s what had to be removed from his passport file in March 2008. The embarrassing something.
The story is that Obama’s personal lawyer went to Hawaii and picked up two certified paper copies of the birth certificate. That’s what they led people to believe was scanned and uploaded to the White House blog.
Sorry, Sam. I forgot that one, too. Good joke!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.