To: Mr Rogers
Rogers, you’re being pathetic again. It’s already been shown that the founders translated the French word “naturel” as “natural-born” as early as 1781. Why do you think that 1797 translation was changed?? It reflected the common interpretation PRIOR to 1797.
37 posted on
02/29/2012 10:19:56 AM PST by
edge919
To: edge919
“It’s already been shown that the founders translated the French word “naturel” as “natural-born” as early as 1781.”
No, they did not. They translated ‘sujets naturel’ as NBS.
39 posted on
02/29/2012 10:28:46 AM PST by
Mr Rogers
("they found themselves made strangers in their own country")
To: edge919
Rogers, you’re being pathetic again. It’s already been shown that the founders translated the French word “naturel” as “natural-born” as early as 1781. Why do you think that 1797 translation was changed?? It reflected the common interpretation PRIOR to 1797. Plus he leaves out the bit about the translator who wrote it did so ten years before it was published.
60 posted on
02/29/2012 2:46:24 PM PST by
DiogenesLamp
(Partus Sequitur Patrem)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson