I don't recall Sven ever backing his theories up with actual sources.
Funny, the same thing could be said of Mr. Obama. I haven't seen anything but weasel statements from any of HIS sources. There are no clear cut and unambiguous statements from Hawaii that some document or other is his "original" birth certificate document.
Putting in the words "or an abstract of the record thereof" renders it useless in terms of being an actual testament. It simply means that it is a recreation of whatever was put into the record, without mentioning the fact that the records are changeable by subsequent acts. The "original" is not.
They dance all around the adoption/birth issue without ever confirming or denying it. This may be fine for private Citizens in the normal order of their business, but by G*D the eligibility for the highest office of our nation should not be subject to such game playing. Answers should be CLEAR and UNAMBIGUOUS.
"THIS DOCUMENT IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL RECORD."
Thus.
Sign it and Stamp it and stop telling us this other piece of fluff is just as good!