The post was not intended to be religious, but to point out that we are being dragged into a real spiritual battle on “progressive” terms.
Putting aside the faith base of the candidates, all of whom are light years above the current occupant, the idea was to provide an indisputable authority to shut them up.
What do we get instead? Apparently 1st Amendment deniers who drag their sectarian interpretations into the argument. Good job! Jim Wallis, BHO’s “spiritual adviser” would be proud of you!
BTW, if I as “author” am to KYA, where to? Your Mom’s basement or at an OWS demonstration? You pays your money, you take your chances.
“1st Amendment denier”? Where? Who’s 1st Amendment did I deny? I saw in your post an attempt to silence those who refute and rebut heresy.
If I misunderstood, my apologies, but gauging by the tone and content of your last comment, I don’t think so.
And with that, as an ex-mormon who has been born again, I’ll tell you again to come KMA if you’re promoting “silence”, since I’m not going to ever give up exposing the truths of mormonism when given an opportunity.
And anyone who thinks they’re going to try and use peurile, amateurish tomes to shut me up has another thing coming. Afterall, isn’t the 1st Amendment a 2 way street? I guess for some it is.
Oh, wait. Isn’t that like an Alinsky tactic or something? Yeah, that’s it the “ridicule” one when you have no other argument.
TTFN
Welcome to FR....
Enjoying your day here?
This has nothing to do with the first amendment. Indeed quiet the opposite...