Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: sten

A default judgement gives the plaintiffs what they want - there is no need to enter any evidence at all.

What happened in Georgia is that the plaintiffs could have had a default judgement but they requested that the case be decided on the merits of their evidence and legal arguments.

The judge found both lacking.

Obama’s team made no arguments or presented no evidence - the plaintiffs failed to prove him ineligible.

Btw - the “have the proceeding dismissed.” is what happens when the plaintiffs fail to show.


23 posted on 02/22/2012 12:18:09 PM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Harlan1196
"Obama’s team made no arguments or presented no evidence - the plaintiffs failed to prove him ineligible."

The burden of proof is with the candidate seeking office.

The candidate seeking office told the judge and the citizens of Georgia to f&%#-off, and never showed up for the hearing.

25 posted on 02/23/2012 5:43:29 AM PST by Godebert (NO PERSON EXCEPT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Harlan1196

you are a real piece of work, dismissal was never considered in Indiana (just like Georgia) despite saying they would

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OreNM9NDxlE


28 posted on 02/24/2012 5:55:07 PM PST by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson