Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Reaganite Republican

I could support any combination of Palin/ Gingrich.

I really wish I could understand the nature of the trouble newt has run into.

he wasn’t my first choice, and I do have problems with things he’s done in the past, but the man is cleary intelligent and articulate. This is a really tough primary to figure out ><.


22 posted on 02/20/2012 8:24:35 PM PST by chris37 (Heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: chris37

Newt Gingrich LOOKS OLD. That’s why he’s having trouble. His hair is white. He looks like he won’t last long in office.


27 posted on 02/20/2012 8:27:31 PM PST by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: chris37
I really wish I could understand the nature of the trouble newt has run into.

he wasn’t my first choice, and I do have problems with things he’s done in the past, but the man is cleary intelligent and articulate. This is a really tough primary to figure out

We're in a Catch-22 situation. The main problem, IMHO, is that thanks to John McCain, GW Bush, and Sandra Day O'Connor McCain-Feingold is the "law" of the land (I put "law" in scare quotes because McCain-Feingold is IMHO not anywhere near compatible with the First Amendment). At the time it was enacted, critics more knowledgable than I said that if in force in 1980 Ronald Reagan couldn't have run for the presidency. So I have to think that Gov. Palin and possibly others have been dissuaded from entering the lists because of "campaign finance reform."

All CFR laws are unconstitutional, IMHO, and McCain-Feingold differs from the others only in being added on top of the others and in being more explicitly unfair. At root, all CFR is predicated on the unconstitutional assumption that the money spent by The New York Times, Inc. to print its newspapers is superior at law to your money or mine, or your money and mine. The distinction between them and us is only that we have not bought a printing press yet. We are entirely within our rights to buy, and operate, one - at our convenience. And to editorialize for or against candidates.

In fact, FR is actually just that. The Constitution stipulates the promotion "of science and the useful arts" as a legitimate objective of the federal government, and stipulates
Amendment 9 - The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people
that the Bill of Rights is a floor under, rather than a ceiling above, the rights of the people. So the fact that FR uses no ink or paper, and no trucks to transport physical newspapers, but does use computers and various electronic communications technology, is quite beside the point.

103 posted on 02/21/2012 2:08:19 PM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (DRAFT PALIN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson