Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Mountain Mary

Am I a hater for asking a question? I see there are no answers forthcoming.

First and foremost, Obama must be defeated or the nation is gone, period. I don’t think Santorum has a prayer of doing that.

So I repeat the innocent quesitons:

Did Rick S say that?

Did he say it recently?

Did he say it in context?

How will that work in the general election?


16 posted on 02/18/2012 6:32:44 AM PST by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: C. Edmund Wright

“then he really is the humorless prig prude I thought him to be?”

I rest my case.


18 posted on 02/18/2012 6:50:24 AM PST by Mountain Mary (Freedom is at stake in this election. Rick Santorum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: C. Edmund Wright

This is why streaks are so important: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2848190/posts?page=24#24


19 posted on 02/18/2012 6:52:42 AM PST by Lakeshark (NbIttoalbl,cRwIdtaa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: C. Edmund Wright
You asked the question, which is fair, and then you went on to call Santorum a humorless prig and a prude. Call me crazy, but I think that may look to some as if you may have something against him. Take that for what it's worth.

I've been Googling and cannot find any direct evidence that Santorum ever said that sex is only for procreation. I realize that that doesn't prove the negative. I could be wrong. What he has said is that his view is the Catholic teaching on sexual relations. Lots of folks (many of whom have it in for the Church, let's be honest) distort the Church's teaching into 'sex only for procreation.' What the Church actually teaches is that sex has two purposes, unitive and procreative, and that it is only for people united in holy matrimony.

That a Christian church would teach that sex is only for married couples should not be a surprise to anyone. Santorum loses the anti-Christian leftists in the media and elsewhere right there. As for the teaching on 'unitive and procreative,' the Church stresses that the sexual union is essential to a marriage because it emotionally binds two people closer to each other by its very nature. That happens whether or not the sex results in a pregnancy.

The part that is tricky for a lot of people is that the sexual union must be open to procreation, meaning that there should be no physical or chemical barriers to prevent that from happening. That is NOT the same as saying that the only reason anyone should have sex is that they want a baby. The Church recognizes legitimate reasons for not wanting to get pregnant (spacing of births, financial difficulty, etc). In fact, as part of the marriage preparatory program, many dioceses now require a Natural Family Planning (NFP) course, teaching scientific methods of avoiding pregnancy while still enjoying a healthy sex life.

So to say that the Church teaches that sex is only for procreation is ridiculous. People who perpetuate that distorted view are either uninformed or disingenuous. I suspect that the above is the view shared by Rick Santorum. If not, then he is out of step with the Catholic Church.

22 posted on 02/18/2012 7:18:57 AM PST by GenXFreedomFighter (If you don't vote for the Republican nominee, more than shame on you. You're on the other side!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: C. Edmund Wright
How will that work in the general election?

Like the second coming of Fritz "I'll-raise-your-taxes" Mondale. But don't worry, it will never happen.

23 posted on 02/18/2012 7:22:46 AM PST by Lady Lucky ( Exposure to the Son may prevent burning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson