You do understand he never said anything about ANY probative evidence being entered by ANY of the parties?? If you believe otherwise, let’s see the quote.
He explicitly rejects Orly’s evidence. Nowhere does he explicitly reject the other plaintiffs evidence. A reasonable assumption is that he accepted it. But in any case, the judge explicitly.rejected their legal argument. They both tried to.show.that Obama’s father was not.a US citizen. The judge thought that because of Ankeny that fact was irrelevant. No evidence in the world.will fix a fundamentally flawed legal argument.