[Harlan1196]

He used Obama’s BC to support his case. When you submit a document the judge will assume it is accurate in it’s entirety unless parts of it are challenged and proved to be inaccurate. That was never done.

[philman_36]

He used Obama’s BC to support his case.
He used the birth certificate for a limited purpose as is evidenced by the associated testimony.

When you submit a document the judge will assume it is accurate in it’s entirety unless parts of it are challenged and proved to be inaccurate.
So now you speak for judges as well? And since when are judges supposed to make assumptions?

So where is this vaunted "stipulation" in Welden’s case?

What does "considered" mean in Section II?

[edge919]

Sorry, but this is nonsense. There’s no point in saying the same document has NO probative value in one part of decision and then assume that it is “accurate in it’s [sic] entirety” in another part of the decision simply because there are different attorneys involved.