Posted on 02/14/2012 4:17:33 PM PST by newheart
And if I had any clue whatsoever as to how one wields a comma, I might even try to write.
Mormons are a CULT plain and Simple, no different than Scientology.
http://www.southparkstudios.com/guide/episodes/s07e12-all-about-mormons
lol..... Mittens will drop-out, soon enough. Even if he's the Nom, he'll lose to Obama in a devestating landslide. Good. We can handle 4 more of obama instead of 4+4 with Romney.
Tricia Erickson’s book: CAN MITT ROMNEY SERVE TWO MASTERS? is available in paperback and on Kindle at AMAZON> If conservatives don’t read it now, I’ll guarantee that Axelrod will make sure they do after Mitt is nominated.
The first two chapters are available to read on line.
Romney is a liberal because of his mormonism not in spite of it. Romney is a mormon of the highest level. Romney’s liberalism (should) disqualifies him from running as a Republican.
I do not do liberals - period.
The US Senate is already under Mormon control.
If he is the candidate, a vote against Romney is a vote for Obama. (PS, I'm maxed out to newt and was to Cain, so don;t waste time calling me a Romney fan. I am, however, a realist.)
All this talk is pure rubbish. I’m far from being a Mitt supporter, but if Obama can sit in the Oval Office, then I’ll take a Mormon over that idiot any day.
There is not a dimes worth of difference between Romney and BHO.
Romney is a liberal because of his mormonism not in spite of it.
SLC lds has been patterning with islam for decades on a variety of things. Joesph Smith declared himself the next mohammed.
Romney’s religious beliefs are important as all candidates beliefs are important. Religious beliefs are at the core of who the person is. It is important to understand what it is they beleive.
That’s why it matters.
That question was answered in the article above:
"The media doesn't really care if you are religious as long as you don't really believe it, let it inform your choices or talk about it in any crowd of more than one person and even then, that person has to be over the age of 18no impressionable children or pets, please."
It’s a weird phobia amongst some. Somehow there is a White Horse involved, and I think the Head Mormon will somehow control the Executive Branch, forcing all civil servants to wear magic underwear and listen to the Mormon Tabernacle choir.
And that’s the rational stuff I’ve heard...
That's a distinction without a difference. Well, one big difference: an Obama in the White House, with Republican majorities in the House and Senate, will at least give us a chance to keep him in check; a Romney in the White House, with majorities in the House and Senate, will not go against their Party's nominee, and will ensure our descent into permanent Socialism.
“If he is the candidate, a vote against Romney is a vote for Obama. “
If he is a candidate, a vote for RINOmney is a vote for Obama.
Fixed it for you!
And THAT is the problem. You nailed it.
I’m not gonna get into it over whether or not Mormon’s are Christians. Quite frankly, I don’t think that’s the issue. The issue is that they believe they are destined to save the Constitution. (Joseph Smith prophecy). They declare in the Temple that the Church is to be put before ALL else.
I remember a Sunday School class that I taught some years ago where we were talking about prayer in public school. I remember I took the VERY minority position of not believing we should have it. And when I asked, “suppose it isn’t a Christian Prayer because Christians aren’t in power”, the mood changed and my minority opinion became the majority one. I bet a Mormon would have NO problem with public school children singing, “Praise to the Man”. Would you?
My point is, if you want a Mormon Theocracy, vote Mitt.
While I think there could be bigger problems with having a Mormon as our Predisent...I did grow up in the Midwest...and the folks I still keep in touch with there look at it like this:
“They (mormons) are pushy and act superior”
...the most interesting comment I heard was from an older relative who said “well that Obama is half and half, but that Romney is all Mormon”.
Sad that it comes down to that sort of thing for a lot of people, but it does.
It is perfectly acceptable for an individual to vote for or against someone based on religion. A person's religion informs their basic understanding of the world, their decision-making, choices and behavior.
But that wasn't really my point. I just think the Republicans are opening themselves up to a devastating defeat simply because the Democrats will take his Mormonism and spin it into complete lunacy.
Still, like you, if Romney is the nominee, I will vote for him over Obama as often as I possibly can.
Yep.
Mormonism is not a problem for a potential president - liberalism is. All this BS about Romney being no better than Obama is simply that - BS. He’s not my choice, but he’d be better than Obama. A one-legged lesbian troll in the White House would be better than 4 more years of Zaphod Beeblebrox. If Romney is the nominee I will vote for him - but lordy, what a choice between evils to have to make.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.