Are you really THIS stupid?? Go back and read post 156. It gives the plaintiffs argument. Read it. (Althogh it may not do any good, since you are so dishonest and you've proven you can't read with your oblivious misunderstanding of the WKA quote).
“Are you really THIS stupid?? Go back and read post 156. It gives the plaintiffs argument. “
No, it doesn’t. It gives what YOU claim is their argument, in direct contradiction to what the court said their argument was.
You are a known and proven liar. You have, as I have documented, repeatedly lied about what people have written.
I have asked for a link, to show that what you claim about their argument is true, and you have provided nothing. Since you are a known liar, and since you offer no evidence, and since the court directly contradicts you, and since no one has appealed or complained since the decision that the judge ignored their case, I have no choice but to believe you are lying again.
If you have evidence, show it. Otherwise, I’ll trust the court documents - published, and never contradicted by the plaintiffs, showing the opposite of what you wrote.
I did find one case where that argument appeared, almost word for word, but it was in Alabama and was thrown out. It had nothing to do with Ankeny.
So post some evidence. Provide a link, showing the plaintiffs complained or appealed based on the judge making false statements about their argument. I don’t think you can, because you are a repeat liar.