Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Responsibility2nd

You are incorrect-my husband has only been gone a couple of years and he was working as a veterans’ benefits counselor at the VA at the time, so he was very much aware of where things were headed. He liked Ron Paul.

After 9-11, he thought that we should defend our own shores and have more bases at home and not in countries where we are not welcome. He did not like nation building or limited force-Viet Nam was his favorite example. He thought if we were attacked, we should kick the enemy’s ass with devastating force, then go home-no money, no nation building.

He didn’t have a problem with don’t ask, don’t tell or homosexuals of either gender in the military-a fellow soldier was a fellow soldier, period, but then he didn’t think anyone should talk about sexual orientation in any job interview-people who don’t set themselves up for it don’t get ostracized. And he never used the term “queer”-not at work, not at home.

The libertarians I know are tired of homosexuals, minorities, space aliens and all others wanting to be a different, protected class from all others, You can be whatever you want-but you are no better than anyone else, so suck it up and act like a human being-no more special treatment. And that is my solution to all this protected class whining...


178 posted on 02/10/2012 7:53:40 PM PST by Texan5 ("You've got to saddle up your boys, you've got to draw a hard line"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies ]


To: Texan5

He sounded like the Americans I grew up with - and respected.

I think of America like the founders did - that we were a better free’er country than the rest of the world. That we would be self sufficient, and morality would come from the bottom up, not the top down. That because we were more of an independent breed of people (not lapdogs), we didn’t need to be told what to do. Our mistakes were our own responsibility, no one else’s. We were free to do as we wished as long as we didn’t hurt anyone else - that covered guns and other dangerous items that cowardly countries kept from their citizenry.

I posted this before as this is the traditional opinion of the rights of the American citizen. I think it sums up the basic right. To be left alone.

*****************

[The] right to be let alone - the most comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized men.
BRANDEIS, U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICE LOUIS, Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 479 (1928)

The right to be let alone is indeed the beginning of all freedom.
DOUGLAS, U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICE WILLIAM O., Public Utilities Commission v. Pollack

The care of every man’s soul belongs to himself. But what if he neglect the care of it? Well what if he neglect the care of his health or his estate, which would more nearly relate to the state. Will the magistrate make a law that he not be poor or sick? Laws provide against injury from others; but not from ourselves. God himself will not save men against their wills.
JEFFERSON, THOMAS, October 1776

To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical.
JEFFERSON, THOMAS, Bill for Religious Freedom, 1779


180 posted on 02/10/2012 8:31:42 PM PST by LibertyLA (fighting libtards and other giant government enablers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson