Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: JustSayNoToNannies

“No, certain of us elect to do this (for love or pay) - and I support punishing caregivers who addle themselves. But they shouldn’t drink either; would you conclude that alcohol should be banned for everybody? “

No, but I think public drunkenness and drunkenness when caring for dependents should be illegal.

One can have a drink or two or three, depending upon amount and time, and not get drunk. Drunkenness is a somewhat subjective call, so, a community just has to set a standard and enforce it.

Adulthood is another example of subjectivity. Some people are adults when they are 15; some never grow up. Our society has selected 18 as the age of majority, and I am content with that.

Similarly, at least in my state, we have deemed “drunk” to be .08, ok, I can live with that. Some may be ok a little higher, but a standard needs to be set. I’m open to tweaking it as called for.


124 posted on 02/10/2012 2:11:25 PM PST by Persevero (Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies ]


To: Persevero
No, certain of us elect to do this (for love or pay) - and I support punishing caregivers who addle themselves. But they shouldn’t drink either; would you conclude that alcohol should be banned for everybody?

No, but I think public drunkenness and drunkenness when caring for dependents should be illegal.

I agree - and I support the same restrictions, and no more, for drugs other than alcohol.

128 posted on 02/10/2012 2:16:10 PM PST by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson