Let’s see, according to liberals, there’s should be a right to health care and a right to free contraception but no right to religious liberty. That one can be tossed.
Not just a right to “health care”, but she embues the government with the right to compell religous institutions to provide “health care” however broadly defined.
Let’s not forget, the founders would, to a man, have vehemently denied that the Constitution said what the Supreme Court held that is said in Roe v. Wade.
However tendentious broadening the definition of “health care” to include what a lot of people would call infanticide, and of a particularly callous nature, might be, the notion that anyone has a Constitutional right to the “health care”, which means, by any definition, the labor and property of third parties, is laughable on its face.
Yes, very true. And the sad thing is: the freedom of religion lies at the very core, the very foundation, of freedom in the West. If it is down away with, freedom itself will cease to exist.