Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Kansas58

I see you are still espousing commie filth...your entire post is commie excrement. Congress cannot interpret the Constitution, to make legislative changes to the Constitution, as you suggest. The USSC interprets the Constitution. Failed civics class, did ya?

Congress can make amendments to the Constitution. It takes a two thirds majority, and then it must be voted upon, and adopted by the states.

The NBC clause was placed in our Constitution to prevent anyone, with any remote possibility of divided allegiance, from becoming POTUS. “Natural Born Citizen” only appears in this one clause, which sets the Constitutional standard to be eligible to serve as Pres, and Vice Pres. Otherwise, the term citizen would have sufficed.

A natural born citizen has two parents, who are both citizens, at the time of birth. Some, like yourself, have sought to pervert the meaning of NBC. Seeking to make anyone born on our soil, even of illegal immigrants, a citizen eligible to become POTUS.

In his letter to Washington, John Jay wrote:
“Permit me to hint, whether it would be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government; and to declare expressly that the Commander in Chief of the American army shall not be given to nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen.”

Now come the commies and the socialists, who seek to redefine the intent of this clause, and the meaning of NBC, to make even an anchor baby eligible to become POTUS.

I will agree, a serious violation of the NBC clause has already occured. Since Obama illegally occupies our Whitehouse. A man of divided loyalties. Obama wholly represents what our founders, with the NBC clause, sought to prevent.

It is a grievous violation that most courts won’t even bother to hear it. And when one does, like the recent Georgia case, the court finds for the defendant, Obama. Even when Obama and his lawyer, under court order, refuse to appear, failing to offer any evidence to rebut the testimony of the plaintiffs, the court finds for the defendant, Obama.

Who gives these judges their marching orders? Under what threats are they failing to honor their lawful duty?


61 posted on 02/05/2012 11:49:26 AM PST by takenoprisoner (Constitutional Conservatism is Americanism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: takenoprisoner
YOU want me to take your advice on Constitutional matters, after that drivel?

SCOTUS does NOT have sole power to interpret the Constitution.

This fact has been stated by my favored candidate, Newt Gingrich, on several occasions.

The Supreme Court gave THEMSELVES “power” they did not have the right or power to give themselves, exclusively.

I am far more of a “Constitutionalist” than you, since you seem to support Judicial Supremacy, which is a far greater threat to the Republic.

Every conservative elected official thinks your cause is hopeless and that your legal case is very weak, yet you attack ME for making this point in writing?

Get a grip and move on!

118 posted on 02/05/2012 3:37:05 PM PST by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson