Actually, the ruling REJECTS the idea that Minor attempted to define NBC. That isn't surprising, since Minor says, "For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these doubts."
If the guy tries to appeal by saying the judge ignored what the judge specifically addressed:
"In deciding whether a woman was eligible to vote, the Minor Court merely concluded that children born in a country of parents who were its citizens would qualify as natural born, and this Court agrees. The Minor Court left open the issue of whether a child born within the United States of alien parent(s) is a natural born citizen."
then his appeal won't go anywhere.
This appeal’s going nowhere anyway.
I feel sorry for anyone who has actually attached emotional importance to this in the false belief it ever had the slightest promise of achieving anything. It has less of a chance than that proverbial snow ball in the unholy place.
Reminds me of the "what the definition of is is".
Rogers, you just contradicted yourself. You said the judge rejected the idea that Minor attempted to define NBC, but then you quoted the judge saying “he Minor Court merely concluded that children born in a country of parents who were its citizens would qualify as natural born.” I’m not sure what country you live in, but here in the United States, that’s an attempt to define it. The judge only takes issue with whether it was an exclusive definition, which is actually proven by reading the whole Minor decision and not Ankeny’s misinterpretation. Couple that with the judge’s failure to provide any legal evidence to support the assumption that Obama was born in Hawaii, then there’s nothing that supports keeping Obama on the ballot.he Minor Court merely concluded that children born in a country of parents who were its citizens would qualify as natural born.
And if they win, Mexicans can take California and shoot the liberal gringos.