Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Harlan1196
No - I understood the argument, I just rejected it as the ramblings of an IT consultant playing Constitutional scholar. It is a compelling argument only to the true believers.

You have yet to demonstrate an understanding of anything, Least of all the topic being discussed.

Again, explain to me why Slaves and Indians were not citizens if the rule is simply being "born here." WHY DID THEY NOT FIT THE CRITERIA OF NATURAL BORN CITIZEN?

505 posted on 02/04/2012 8:47:04 AM PST by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 496 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp

Because slaves were property and not legally persons and Indians were born of independent nations and therefore not under the jurisdiction of the US government.

The simpler answer is that the founding fathers did not want slaves and Indians to be citizens.


509 posted on 02/04/2012 8:51:30 AM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 505 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson