In this finding,referencing an Indiana case, is the following statement which implies Anchor babies are eligible to run for president.- tom
The Indiana Court rejected the argument that Mr. Obama was\ ineligible, stating that children born within the United States are natural born citizens, regardless of the citizenship of their parents. Id. at 688. This Court finds the decision and analysis of Arkeny persuasive
So,what about all of the testimony about phony Social Security numbers, fake birth certificates, etc..........
Is it STILL in the court records.......or did that get shredded?
What a load of crap!
According to the astute and knowledgeable wimp of a Judge Malihi you can look
here (Joaquin 'Chapo' Guzman) for your Dem Pres and VP nominees in 2046.
Chapo and his twin girls will love that ruling…
Relying on an Indiana POS ruling, what a cop out.
"The Indiana Court rejected the argument that Mr. Obama was ineligible, stating that
children born within the United States are natural born citizens, regardless of the citizenship of their parents."
I believe the Indiana ruling was blatantly "insincere" to allow its prompt overturning.
Whoever said our Constitution matters anymore?
Somehow the term Natural plus Born plus Citizen isn't so difficult for my little brain to process.
I suppose our Founding Fathers omitted the definition because it's self defining.
That is unless you want to call the sky green…
I'm gonna guess the SCOTUS is too busy looking at ObammieCare to take up such a trivial issue as this one.
The POS is a fraud, he knows it, I know it and you know it.
Well folk, the battle wages on…I'm sure the Obots see this a nail in the coffin, think again.
I want his A$$ out of DC and in Gitmo with all his "work" undone, plain and simple.
∑ß´®ß∞øˆ†∞∑π†…
There is something strange about this ruling and even perhaps the judge. For one thing the ruling as posted does not recognize any parentage at all. For another thing that a judge would make a decision based on SC of Indiana when there was evidence presented to the contrary on another higher USA court decision in conflict shows prejudice/preference . Another thing is that these kind of decisions appear to be orchestrated after a display of court fairness i.e. Carter and and the one in Washington. Something is going on that is way beyond and above the people of the USA whether that is money or fear or something else is crucial to the future of the USA. I found it interesting that this evening on Hannity Trump spoke out that there is so much unknown about Obama