Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: BuckeyeTexan

so they STIPULATED to birth in Hawaii, thus rendering the birth certificate moot

AND(!!!!)

declined the default judgment! Do these lawyers make a habit of just pissing off judges?

1. they should have accepted the default
2. they never should have stipulated.

the judges hands were tied and the letter of the law was followed.


116 posted on 02/03/2012 3:13:08 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]


To: longtermmemmory

No, if they had accepted the default, they wouldn’t have had the opportunity to present any evidence. And they wouldn’t be able to appeal.

The two plaintiffs who stipulated were arguing the definition of NBC. The BC was relevant to their case only in that it legally established Senior as Junior’s father.

They got it right, procedurally.


124 posted on 02/03/2012 3:19:45 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]

To: longtermmemmory

By stipulating Obama’s being born in Hawaii, he is a natural born citizen. Thus, he qualifies under jus soli.


127 posted on 02/03/2012 3:22:38 PM PST by moviefan8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson