Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mitt: The 'Safety Net' IS The Problem
The Free Republic Vanity and Public Embarrasment Section | 1/2/12 | Mr. K

Posted on 02/02/2012 6:32:16 AM PST by Mr. K

It has frequently been said that if you wait long enough Mitt Romney will say something you like. It also applies for somethign you don't like.

The other day a big deal was made about his comment that he "doesn't care about the poor"

While it does give us a great chance to point out (yet again) the media bias by very easily demonstrating how out of context that statement is, the real context is disturbing in another way

If Mitt thinks the 'safety net' takes care of the poor, he is desperately and fatally wrong.!

These 'safety net' programs are THE SOURCE OF MOST OF OUR PROBLEMS!

They eat up a major portion of the budget and never 'help' the people they were intended to help, increase the size and scope and intrusion of the government into our entire lives, and bring down the best in the country for the benefit of the government class. (I bet you thought I was going to say benefit of 'The Poor' -no, they are the LEAST helped)

They are stocked with government employees whose usual workday consists of figuring out how to manipulate the union rules to their own financial benefit.

They forced families to depend on the government, and tore apart husbands and wives and families, by their policies. They suck up huge amounts of money, and the waste and fraud are incredible.

Let's take Welfare. By the governments own figures, it costs $100,000 to hand out $27,000 in Welfare.

$73,000 is wasted. That is a decent full-time salary.

That is the equivalent of one full-time government employee for every family on Welfare.

There used to be a joke about how big and bloated the Federal Bureau of Indian Affairs had gotten- The joke cartoon showed a man in the Indian Affairs office crying at his desk- another two employees are talking and one asks why the man is crying- and the other replies "His Indian died"

Private charities like churches are 85% efficient or more. We could cut the Welfare program in half, give that money to churches to take care of people- and be better off all around. The families would be helped by local people who know them instead of a governmet bureaucrat. And they might get a religious enlightenment too.

Does anyone remember Social Security "crazy checks"? If you can get you child to act odd enough (or even easier- get them diagnosed with ADHD) you can collect Social Security.

It is good that he knows the middle class is paying for all this, but this shows to me Mitt's complete lack of understanding that the fundamental problem facing the government is THE GOVERNMENT.

As Ronald Reagan once said: "The Government is not the solution to problems- usually it is the cause"


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: mittforbrains
Mitt must not win the primaries!

DO WHATEVER YOU CAN!

TEA Party March on GOP headquarters anyone?

1 posted on 02/02/2012 6:32:22 AM PST by Mr. K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
The other day a big deal was made about his comment that he "doesn't care about the poor"

Know what? I don't either. My guess is that 99% of the poor are that way because they made poor decisions along life's journey. In most cases, I think those decisions are early in life while they were in school. They saw little value to being educated and no one was there to correct that perception. If someone cannot earn a living because of a physical impairment of some kind, they should be helped. However, the direction of that help should be to teach them some kind of skill set that allows them to be self-sufficient. Politicians, on the other hand, want to give them my money to forever buy their votes. I'm more than a little tired of paying for someone else's poor decision making.

2 posted on 02/02/2012 6:44:56 AM PST by econjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
The 'Safety Net' hammock IS The Problem

Seriously, not only is the cost to provide the services out of line, but all the fraud (collecting while working off the books or selling drugs, claiming extra kids, collecting under multiple IDs, etc.) probably triples the cost.

3 posted on 02/02/2012 6:45:27 AM PST by JimRed (Excising a cancer before it kills us waters the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: econjack

Conservatives please stop your damn complaining. I’m an ultra right wing conservative who left the GOP when Bush was still President. And if the GOP nominee in 2012 is Charles Manson I will vote for him because ANYONE is better than the POS Commie in the WH now.


4 posted on 02/02/2012 6:59:11 AM PST by rjsclassics (bringing people together)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
Once again Republicans choose exactly the wrong candidate with the wrong biography and the wrong impulses to make the arguments. What other candidate ideally fits hand-in-glove with Obama’s campaign theme of class warfare. Perfect. Perfectly wrong. Wait till the media tees off on the racism of the Mormon church. Dovetails with another prominent theme of Obama’s campaign. Just have to wonder, are they naturally this stupid or do they work at it.
5 posted on 02/02/2012 7:01:04 AM PST by throwback ( The object of opening the mind, as of opening the mouth, is to shut it again on something solid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimRed
Correct. That's a favorite saying of our local morning drive host. The safety net has been turned into a hammock.
6 posted on 02/02/2012 7:06:38 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rjsclassics
Conservatives please stop your damn complaining. I’m an ultra right wing conservative who left the GOP when Bush was still President. And if the GOP nominee in 2012 is Charles Manson I will vote for him because ANYONE is better than the POS Commie in the WH now.

Then:

a.) Your self definition is lacking.

b.) You are easily manipulated by the GOP and your principles/values are pretty meaningless.
7 posted on 02/02/2012 7:45:17 AM PST by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
If you really take an interest in why Romney may have said what he did (not to justify the way he said it), take a minute to read this. Does this article answer the question of what Romney, and the country, should really be worried about regarding the middle class?

This is a Spanish news article published the same day as Romney's comment.

Spanish Headline: Poverty trap for middle classes of Europe

"Unemployment has hit record levels in the EU, putting nearly a quarter of those Europeans who until now had a decent standard of living at risk of sliding into social exclusion. The phenomenon is undermining the EU’s strategies against poverty."

http://www.presseurop.eu/en/content/article/1469391-poverty-trap-middle-classes-europe

8 posted on 02/02/2012 9:17:11 AM PST by LZ_Bayonet ( I AM THE TEA PARTY LEADER !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

I’m holding out hope that Mitt is a closet conservative.


9 posted on 02/02/2012 10:17:24 AM PST by killermosquito (Buffalo, Detroit (and eventually France) is what you get when liberalism runs its course.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
Social Security Disability statistics

There are currently 11.2 million adults collecting SS disability, double what it was in 1992. They collect an avg monthly benefit of 678.80. Total monthly payouts are close to $10 billion ($120B/year)

SSI payments to children: there are 1.2 million children under 18 getting SSI, total benefits $812M, avg monthly payment $601.

10 posted on 02/02/2012 11:24:59 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (I'd agree with you, but then we would both be wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625
breaking down by race, whites accounted for 33% of SSI disability recipients under 9 years old, and 41% of those 9 to 18.
11 posted on 02/02/2012 11:34:33 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (I'd agree with you, but then we would both be wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

there you go, you know me well. I’m manipulated by the GOP. In short, you’re an idiot!


12 posted on 02/02/2012 5:09:33 PM PST by rjsclassics (bringing people together)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

They took what Mtt said out of context for the first time this election. They did it to Newt countless times, like when he said “I’m going to be the nominee” and when he said he would “arrest judges he disagreed with.” Welcome to the party, pal.


13 posted on 02/02/2012 5:14:16 PM PST by ez (When you're a hammer, everything looks like a nail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

By the way, your master Obama will lose in a landslide this November. I can’t wait


14 posted on 02/02/2012 5:17:03 PM PST by rjsclassics (bringing people together)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: killermosquito

Dear God I hope so.


15 posted on 02/02/2012 7:11:31 PM PST by Mr. K (Physically unable to profreed <--- oops, see?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ez

Funny thing is, I was NOT a huge Gingrich supporter UNTIL he said the “Arrest the judges” comment.

I’m all for that


16 posted on 02/04/2012 8:14:34 AM PST by Mr. K (Physically unable to profreed <--- oops, see?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson