Replies


	Romney			Gingrich			Santorum			Paul			Huntsman			Perry			Bachman			Totals
	Votes	%	Delegts	Votes	%	Delegts	Votes	%	Delegts	Votes	%	Delegts	Votes	%	Delegts	Votes	%	Delegts	Votes	%	Delegts	Votes	Delegts
Iowa	39,805	30.46%	7	16,163	12.37%	2	29,839	22.83%	7	26,036	19.92%	7	245	0.19%	0	12,557	9.61%	0	6,046	4.63%	0	130,691	23
New Hampshire	97,532	39.77%	7	23,411	9.55%	0	23,362	9.53%	0	56,848	23.18%	3	41,945	17.11%	0	1,766	0.72%	0	349	0.14%	0	245,213	10
South Carolina	167,279	27.75%	2	243,153	40.34%	23	102,055	16.93%	0	77,993	12.94%	0	1,161	0.19%	0	2,494	0.41%	0	494	0.08%	0	602,821	25
Florida	771,842	46.30%	50	531,294	31.87%	0	222,248	13.33%	0	116,776	7.00%	0	6,182	0.37%	0	6,742	0.40%	0	3,947	0.24%		1,667,223	50











At large Dels			18			2			1			0			0			0			0		21
TOTALS	1,076,458	40.81%	84	814,021	30.86%	27	377,504	14.31%	8	277,653	10.53%	10	49,533	1.88%	0	23,559	0.89%	0	10,836	0.41%	0	2,637,756	129

It's pretty straight forward based on the cumulative totals thus far.

Rick needs to bow out and throw in behind Newt. If he does, the conservative base will win. If he does not he will continue to split the vote and hand it to Romney.

I believe Santorum is actually the more conservative of the two...but he is not garnering support and does not have that spark that inspires people to get onboard and fight with all they have. Newt does. Newt simply needs to control his emotions and stay on topic and target.

If he does...and if Rick does this, Newt wins.

BTW, Newt won SC by 12.59% on a total vote of around 600,000. Mitt beat newt by 14.43% on a total vote of 1.66 million. We cannot underestimate Mitt and think he cannot get a large percentage of the vote in large states. He proved yesterday that he can so this ceiling we had hoped he was not going to crack is now a myth and we need to get Newt and Rick together so they can beat those numbers.

There is something to be gained in dissecting numbers. 53% did not want Romney who needs all of them.

Bush 2000 says Romney cannot afford to lose anyone in his supposed fight to defeat Obama.

I for one will work against him even if he wins the nomination.

Rick needs to bow out and throw in behind Newt. If he does, the conservative base will win. If he does not he will continue to split the vote and hand it to Romney.

This needs to be put to Rick in VERY clear terms.

He is not going to get the nomination.

Therefore, does Rick really want to become the guy that put Mittwitt on the Republican ticket, thus losing the general election and subjecting the united States to little bammy's "Endgame For America?"

I believe Santorum is actually the more conservative of the two...

In many areas that might be true.

However, there exists in dee-cee a gigantic rat nest of socialists, marxists, fascists, and outright communists, woven together with all the cash their grubby hands can loot from the American people plus warehouse loads from "other" (illegal) sources.

Rick does not posses the depth of experience it will require to design the process that will deconstruct that rat's nest. Undoubtedly he is a great guy and good at what he has done in the past but the task ahead is far beyond his skill set.

Newt is far from perfect HOWEVER he is capable of constructing the machine that can effectively unravel the communist cluster f*** of the donks.

Rick should be smart enough to know that there IS a place for him just as there will be for ALL of the solid conservatives if the election goes our way. If it does not? There will not be anyplace for him or anyone else that is not kissing the communist ring.

Again, the question is...

Does Rick Santorum want to become the guy that subjected the united States to little bammy's "Endgame For America?"

BTW, the same is true for Ron Paul but he is just beyond reasoning with.

One more thing, did you make that chart yourself or is is posted somewhere? Thanks!

. .