What is the DOH in Hawaii up to?

Confidential ^ | 1/20/2012 | Greg Goss

[epicurious]

Butter,

I read your blog this AM and if I could delete the most recent FR comment I made I would. I overreacted and I hereby retract a significant portion of what I wrote.

No one wants public recognition by name; I know I certainly do not. Otherwise I’ll likely end up in a FEMA camp as a suspected terrorist. Just a kind and anonymous mention that some of the information you report is sometimes the work and contribution of other researchers who are just as dedicated as you are to revealing the truth that hopefully leads to the arrest, conviction, and imprisionment of the usurper-in-chief and everyone else who has aided and abetted the perpetuated fraud. We are all on the same team in a broad sense.

I have great admiration and appreciation for all that you have done. I don’t think there are too many out there who have put in as much time and effort into this endeavor as you have. And for that, I thank you.

Regards.

Epi

[butterdezillion]

No problem. It’s always timely to be reminded to thank people for their efforts. Every piece is so important and they are all so interconnected. And some of the most central pieces are hidden from the view of most people. It makes me really sad to think that anybody I’ve worked with would have any question about how much I value and respect what they are doing to help this whole effort - and to help me. To anybody who feels that way, all I can say is that I am very, very sorry.

I hope that someday this will all be resolved and the people who worked on this can come forward without fear - if for no other reason than so everyone can see how deep the love of America runs, and what so many unsung heroes were willing to pitch in when nobody was visibly cheering them on. Epi, you’re one of those who have put in so much time and effort - from which I have benefitted and for which I am very thankful - and I hope the full story of that comes out before long.

[Greenperson]

I see that you semi-retracted your comment but it made some notorious charges without foundation. Who exactly is the “other researcher” who was first to discover the potential identity theft? Many individuals knew the name of that child and as many were independently researching that name, for a long time, as well as the names of other deceased infants. It’s not rocket science. It’s the stuff of detective and police fiction. Everyone knows how identity theft works and if they don’t, Bill Ayers explained it all for us.

Who hasn’t seen a movie where a criminal walks a cemetery, looking for the name of a deceased infant to use for his new identity?

The WWW is available to all. Many of us know how to plumb the depth of online databases and genealogy websites and cemetery records and library resources and newspapers. Need I go on?

Not everyone broadcasts their finds. Not everyone broadcasts with whom they work. Not everyone wants “credit” and because they don’t, sometimes johnny-come-latelys believe that they were “first”.

I read nothing at that link that indicated that butterdezillion was taking credit for anyone else’s discoveries. Nor is she concocting conspiracies. I’m willing to guarantee you that you didn’t know that the child was moved from Punchbowl to Miliani before others knew. I’d be willing to bet that others knew a lot about all of these many issues long before Post & Email or WND knew. Who is building upon whose research?

butterdezillion is among the most humble of the MANY ineligibility researchers and there are many research groups. You were most “unkind” to have made this unfounded attack on her character. She’s a brave person. Braver than most and we all owe her a debt of gratitude. Her gracious acceptance of your semi-retraction and her unnecessary apology says it all. She’s a standup person and a patriot. And a friend, I hope.