Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: HiTech RedNeck

Perhaps with 0bama a no show Jablonski was afraid any evidence he would submit would be considered direct testimony and be put in a purjury trap . This happened during the hearing to Orly when she began making statements ,, the judge stopped her and asked her if she were in fact starting to testify . She was then sworn in and then testified to the evidence or statements she presented .


10 posted on 01/29/2012 12:44:02 PM PST by Lionheartusa1 (-: Socialism is the equal distribution of misery :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Lionheartusa1

With Orly it sounds like a simple mistake. She didn’t intend to present non-sworn “testimony” — she was just too eager to get going. And she didn’t mind the judge correcting the oversight and swearing her in as a witness.

But you may be right, heck if Jaw-bluster was going to permit Obama to be sworn!


15 posted on 01/29/2012 12:56:03 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Sometimes progressives find their scripture in the penumbra of sacred bathroom stall writings (Tzar))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson