Send your appreciation to:
Contact: Valerie Ruff for Judge Malihi Case Management Assistant vruff@osah.ga.gov Tel: (404) 651-7595 Fax: (404) 818-3751
http://www.osah.ga.gov/judges-dir-detail.aspx?StaffID=mmalihi
Call, email respectful appreciation. Some have said it’s essential for Judge Malihi to sense that “we the people” are behind him and his action. So let’s remove any doubt the Judge might have of the strong support we’re offering.
“we don’t believe your little state or your silly hearing are worth our time”
Is that an actual quote?
It is unlikely Judge Malihi will allow Obama’s attorney to submit additional evidence or a pleading after he failed to appear.
OFFICE OF STATE ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
CHAPTER 616-1-2
ADMINISTRATIVE RULES OF PROCEDURE
616-1-2-.30 Default. Amended.
(1) A default order may be entered against a party that fails to participate in any stage of a proceeding, a party that fails to file any required pleading, or a party that fails to comply with an order issued by the Administrative Law Judge.
(2) Any default order may provide for a default as to all issues, a default as to specific issues, or other limitations, including limitations on the presentation of evidence and on the defaulting party’s continued participation in the proceeding. After issuing a default order, the Administrative Law Judge shall proceed as necessary to resolve the case without the participation of the defaulting party, or with such limited participation as the Administrative Law Judge deems appropriate, and shall determine all issues in the proceeding, including those affecting the party in default.
What up wid Dat? Aren't they supposed to present and exchange evidence before the hearing and then give oral argument in real time with the Judge to judge shortly after.
Ping.
The media is not covering this...so, it must not be happening.
And if it is...they still won’t cover it.
In the event that Judge Malihi rules against zero, the entire case becomes very interesting. Much of American law is based on precedent and legal rulings and, assuming the judgement goes against Obama, it sets a legal precedent that can be introduced in other cases.
Should that occur, I’d stock up on popcorn and batten down the hatches . . . . . . just in case.
Doubtless, zero will appeal and probably go judge shopping to find a sympathetic liberal judge to overturn Judge Malihi’s ruling (which won’t be hard!). That will then lead to more appeals and, potentally, a SCOTUS filing. Of course, by then, zero may well be out of office, but the matter still needs to be resolved. It has been VERY disturbing to note that virtally very previous case challenging zero’s eligibility has ben thrown out based on legal standing. To date, not a single judge or court has defind who has legal standing to bring this type of case against a sitting president, but they have denied that he different people who HAVE filed such cases have the standing. So who does?
IMO, ANY American citizen should have standing to bring such a case to court because this is a fundamental Constitutional issue. As such, ANY citizen should have the right and, if not, I don’t think we have implemented the Constitution the way that the Founding Fathers planned!!
If so, is he ready to retire (be disbarred) for blatant contempt?
Øbozo certainly appears to be trying to place himself above the law.
The article is concerned about a possible attempt to collapse one of the three legs of our "separate but equal" branches of government -- but it ignores that all-important fourth leg: The People.
It would appear to be a major strategic mistake to chart a course to deliberately destroy the judiciary -- without first destroying the Second Amendment that empowers the People. If this ploy is, indeed, aimed at overpowering the Judiciary, it could conceivably turn out to be be one huge miscalculation...
Nor am I convinced that our military would stand idly by and let an usurper destroy a third of our government, either...
~~~~~~~~~
Perhaps we are seeing the first glimpse of arrogant overconfidence sowing the seeds of its own destruction...
Here’s my prediction ... this story starts to get legs, other states question Obama’s eligibility in court, and we (or Israel) drop a huge bomb on Iran’s nuclear facilities. Just like the Clinton years ... when the Lewinski scandal got too hot in the media, the CIC ordered the bombing of Baghdad & Saddam Hussein. A favorite ‘Rat tactic ... divert the attention of the masses.
Posting for interest sake. These are the Rules by which the attorneys and parties are to comply with this Court:
Excerpt of ADMINISTRATIVE RULES OF PROCEDURE for Georgia Office of Administrative Hearings.
616-1-2-.22 Hearing Procedure. Amended.
(5) Upon application by a party, the Administrative Law Judge shall certify the facts to the
superior court of the county in which a party, agent, or employee of a party:
(a) disobeys or resists any lawful order or process;
(b) neglects to produce, after having been ordered to do so, any pertinent book, paper, or
document;
(c) refuses to appear after having been subpoenaed;
(d) upon appearing, refuses to take the oath or affirmation as a witness;
(e) after taking the oath or affirmation, refuses to testify; or
(f) disobeys any other order issued by an Administrative Law Judge
for a determination of the appropriate action, including a finding of contempt.
616-1-2-.30 Default. Amended.
(1) A default order may be entered against a party that fails to participate in any stage of a
proceeding, a party that fails to file any required pleading, or a party that fails to comply with an
order issued by the Administrative Law Judge. Any default order shall specify the grounds for
the order.
(2) Any default order may provide for a default as to all issues, a default as to specific issues,
or other limitations, including limitations on the presentation of evidence and on the defaulting
party’s continued participation in the proceeding. After issuing a default order, the
Administrative Law Judge shall proceed as necessary to resolve the case without the
participation of the defaulting party, or with such limited participation as the Administrative Law
Judge deems appropriate, and shall determine all issues in the proceeding, including those
affecting the party in default.
[EXCERPT]
A WEBCommentary contributor included the following information at the below linked site:
“I spoke with Attorney Taitz on Saturday 28 January and she indicated that Judge Malihi has expedited his recommendation/ruling and has reset the date of attorney submissions to 1 February.”
http://www.webcommentary.com/php/ShowArticle.php?id=zieves&date=120129
So we can keep that date in mind instead of February 5th.