Posted on 01/29/2012 10:49:52 AM PST by mnehring
Ping,
Thought this old racist magazine from the 1930s was dead decade ago but it is still around and guess who is praising it.
Ron Paul is a highly seductive nut.
“...ought to settle the matter among people of open minds.”
That sure doesn’t include out the average Paul cultist.
typo correction:
That sure doesn’t include the average Paul cultist.
When Ron Paul is photographed smiling with a well-known white supremacists, when Ron Paul is described as having frequent meetings with neo-Nazis, when Ron Paul refuses to return money sent to him by Aryan Nation lawyers, when Ron Paul speaks before the Robert A. Taft club -- a group with ties to white supremacists, and when Ron Paul either supervised or wrote consistently racist political newsletters from which he earned financial profits, Ron Paul supporters have an quick explanation: Ron Paul didn't actually know anything about any of these activities.
/bingo
Except for the “highly seductive” part. :’)
What will Ron Paul think of next? Perhaps a specific defense of the blood libel on his Congressional letterhead?
I’m trying to predict the Paultard’s excuses. It will be either:
1. The American Mercury isn’t racist, that is just PC talk by leftists.
or
2. Oh, the newsletters again, everyone knows Paul didn’t know about them and apparently his ghostwriter also had his congressional letterhead (which brings up a whole other issue).
bookmark
They seem to have restarted in 2010.
“Ron Paul Praised Anti-Semitic Magazine On Congressional Letterhead”
Could you show us where in fact Paul has praised American Mercury? The letter (http://www.tnr.com/sites/default/files/Aug79Let.PDF) shows that Paul thanked Amos W. Bruce for sending a copy of an article, which Paul says he found interesting.
Another lie perhaps? If Paul is so bad, why do people have to lie about his positions?
or 3. Nobody cares about your incessant vanities as shown by the lack of replies to your spamming on FR lately. You used to be one of the better posters around here. Damn shame.
It should be footnoted that the “American Mercury” was not anti Semetic or racist from its beginnings in the 20’s until it was bought out in 1952. Thereafter, it was despicable.
once again, here it is, this time on his own letterhead
you are supporting a racist anti-semite for president
you have been given the proof right here in his own letterhead document
his own
You are right, unfortunately they keep talking about their founding as though those who started it would somehow condone what they have become.
you are supporting a racist anti-semite for president
you have been given the proof right here in his own letterhead document
his own
Is your Shift and Period key broken? I feel like I'm reading from a third-grader.
is your sense of reading comprehension so flawed that you are the new post nanny on everyone’s grammar?
Hey, this little self-imposed grammar nanny named you in his home page! :)
http://www.freerepublic.com/~jmc813/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.