Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Dilbert San Diego
The only place I have heard about this is on the internet.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Shame on Rush, Levin, Hannity, and the other so-called yappers for ignoring this!

Seems like it is going to be a repeat of 2008. All those so-called conservative yappers who claim to care soooooo much about the Constitution ( some even cry over it) will again IGNORE Article 2, Section 1. Our phone calls to their programs will be turned away. Our e-mails will be blocked. AGAIN!

Gee! One yapper, Rush Limbaugh, even **brags** about the American Flag on display in his living room given to him by U.S. fighter pilots. I don't know why he doesn't wither in shame when he walks by it. How many dead soldiers are due to the direct rules of engagement and policy decision made by the Usurper, who Rush **deliberately** failed to vet. The weenie!

20 posted on 01/29/2012 11:13:50 AM PST by wintertime (I am a Constitutional Restorationist!!! Yes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: wintertime

I think that the radio guys have all been threatened and must remain silent if they want to keep their jobs. Rush indicated this one day.


35 posted on 01/29/2012 11:45:53 AM PST by dandiegirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: wintertime

wintertime says: “Shame on Rush, Levin, Hannity, and the other so-called yappers for ignoring this!”

Amen! I hear considerable conservative blustering about Obama’s philosophies, which are obviously unAmerican but never really referenced as such in national media. Newt talks about Saul Alinsky, Beck discusses socialism, and Rush and Hannity slather it on with similar references.

But none of them are willing to address the root issue - WHY Obama was not raised to appreciate American culture, but rather to rebel and fight against it. It is exactly this kind of foreign influence which the Framers intended to preclude from the US Presidency by requiring “natural born Citizen” status.

But the national media, even the conservative wing of that industry, finds the subject taboo, even to the point of ignoring the fact that, as of 01/26/2012, a state court in Georgia has finally accepted testimony and evidence in a legitimate complaint that Barack Obama is Constitutionally ineligible to serve as POTUS.

This event should have opened up a full discussion of the issue in the media, but instead we find a virtual syndicated news blackout. Even Drudge only carried a small blurb about it for a couple of hours, then - poof! - gone. Someone mentions Obama’s Indonesian upbringing on Hannity recently and he shuts it down to avoid “...getting me in trouble.”

My belief is that a treacherous deal was struck when then-Senators Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton signed off on Senate Resolution 511, a non-binding agreement accepting John McCain as a natural born citizen, even though he was not born on US soil, because his parents (plural) were US citizens upon his birth. From that moment on, I believe Obama’s illegitimacy was off limits.

What’s the down side of breeching that contract at this point? It must be formidable to keep this issue in check for so long.

SO, then, what’s the downside of keeping the agreement? It seems to me that Republicans and Democrats have conspired in this matter to the ruination of the Constitution, no less.

What could be worse than both major parties in cooperation against the Constitution? This presents awesome challenges and responsibility to we citizens to overthrow this concerted attack on the Supreme Law of our land.

I wonder: Are we up to it?


104 posted on 01/29/2012 7:20:36 PM PST by TexasVoter (No Constitution? No Union!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson