Posted on 01/27/2012 5:25:02 PM PST by geraldmcg
On January 26, 2012, a state court in Georgia is scheduled to conduct an impartial hearing on a case filed against Obamas natural-born-citizen eligibility for President according to Georgia state law. This after the judge rejected a motion for dismissal put forth by attorneys for the White House.
As a result, the incumbent President running for reelection MIGHT NOT APPEAR ON THE BALLON in the Georgia primary. AND GEORGIA IS A BIG STATE WITH LOTS OF ELECTORAL DELEGATES!
How can this happen? Could this be the first of other states to hear similar cases before their primaries? If court decisions begin to trend towards disqualifying Obama, what does that mean for his current status as President and his chances of being elected for four more years come November?
As an attorney and legal analyst, Gary Kreep of The US Justice Foundation (USJF) is keeping a watchful eye on the Georgia case. While not as an attorney of record in the Georgia eligibility litigation, he is involved in similar cases around the country. Garys own journey to legally challenge Obamas eligibility on a federal level began when, on behalf of his clients, Ambassador Alan Keyes, Wiley S. Drake and Markham Robinson, he filed suit in the California state court system at the 2008 election, as well as in the federal system. And his cases are still working their way through the process.
Bottom line: The Georgia hearing is THE case to watch and that if justice is done, Obama will not likely appear on the Georgia ballot. But if this case does not soon emerge prominently in the public eye, dirty deeds might be done in the dark to quietly squash this hearing. So, please pread the word.
(Excerpt) Read more at 888webtoday.com ...
He is being contested as candidate Obama. Candidate Obama, runing for POTUS in the ‘12 election, has not yet qualified for the GA ballot. That’s what the hearing was about.
Have notice a couple of the “old” SPs on this thread???
PING!!!
Thanks for the ping. I think a higher court will protect Obama, but I would like to see a public announcement by this judge that Obama isn’t an American citizen; he is a citizen of Indonesia.
Many of the befogged trolls have been zotted. It’s interesting to see which posters step into the breach.
“As I understand the process, the ALJ opinion is merely advisory to the AG.”
It’s an advisory opinion to the Georgia SoS. Once the GA SoS makes a decision, then either the Plaintiffs or the Defendant in the Admin Hearing can file a complaint with Georgia Superior Court.
Safari.
On Google page at your link to results, Click on News, then Past 24 Hours.
What do you see?
Just a small correction. It was Fukino’s description not Fuddys.
Dr. Chiyome Fukino, the former director of Hawaii’s Department of Health
I see multiple sites and page after page about it. The first three of four pages have nothing but that and it only starts to really fade out after about page 25 or so.
It was offered here:
Scholars have missed this ultimate check and balance in the "silence of the Constitution". No state can keep any legal candidate off the ballot, but a state can keep anyone off the ballot who does not provide legal documentation they are qualified to be President. That is the Constitution at it's core in the Articles concerning the Presidency. 49 states can state a fraud can be President in their super majority, but if one state demands proof and the candidate does not provide that legal proof, the one state in checks and balances can negate a national Presidential Election.
...The experts will try to state that .. can not override a majority vote by 49 other states, ..A President must be accepted by all 50 states according to legal Constitutional requirements. Any subject failing to provide natural born status can legally be rejected by any one state, and that one state in its minority rights will negate the other 49 states in the check and balance the Founders left silently in the Constitution to protect America from threats domestic and foreign.
.
Danae offers this from: Article II Section 1 .
The executive power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. He shall hold his office during the term of four years, and, together with the Vice President, chosen for the same term, be elected, as follows:
Each state shall appoint, in such manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a number of electors, equal to the whole number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or person holding an office of trust or profit under the United States, shall be appointed an elector.
The electors shall meet in their respective states, and vote by ballot for two persons, of whom one at least shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves. And they shall make a list of all the persons voted for, and of the number of votes for each; which list they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate.
++++++++++++++++++++++ So if Obama is off the ballot in Georgia... the DNC MUST present another candidate somehow in that state! There must be 2 persons for electors to choose from! oOOOOOOOoooooo the Ante has just been upped!! So much is riding on Malihi's decision, and a Default judgment with Commentary based upon that validity of the evidence presented, and lacking any rebuttal.... Oh, there is no hiding THAT. The press will HAVE to take notice. .. Danae
.
Thank you. All I could remember is it was a HI official whose statement the anti-birthers threw in our faces thousands of times in the earlier days. As soon as the NON-half-handwritten BC came out, we heard no more about her [Fukino].
Liberals: they are blind to their own duplicity.
Odd. I only get 228,000 results at your link.
“”First a GA Primary maybe we can start a Southern Avalanche.””
That Was The Night That The Lights Went Out In Georgia!!
If it goes badly for bozo and his crowd, they just may decide we don’t need lights in GA! Be prepared!
Ah. K. Thanks for the info. Wasn’t familiar.
“I only wish there had been a way to introduce Fuddys description of the original birth record - i.e.: that it was half handwritten.”
The only legal and full original BC Obama has is his adoption BC recognizing Lolo Soetoro as his father.
When Obama and H.Clinton were battling it out during the spring and summer of 2008, Butterdezillion and Miss Tickley were shaking the Hawaii DOH very hard and something interesting fell out before Hawaii went into cover-their-ass mode: a birth index for 1960-1964 with BHO2’s name on it. The document was listed as Filed - Not Accepted.
Many folks on FR responded stating that they knew why that would be so: the BC was very late in being submitted, and it was incomplete. That also meant this BC was not a legal identification document. Fuddy claimed it was half-hand written, and that does not sound like one generated by a hospital.
Keep in mind that concurrent in this time frame, newspaper announcements came out stating that Mr.& Mrs. Obama had a baby boy on August 4, 1961.
No hospital is given and the baby is not named. The address provided turns out to be where Grandpa and Grandma Dunham were renting the guesthouse at the back of the property.
This whole scenario would be implausible if BHO2 was born in Hawaii. If he had been born in Hawaii then the birth certificate would have been complete, submitted in a timely manner and be legal, and his name would have been proudly posted on the birth announcements.
Conclusion: he was born somewhere else.
Whatever BHO2 is pushing as his real BC, it is not.
Good report. Thanks.
Correction: Fuddy should read Fukino.
“This whole scenario would be implausible if BHO2 was born in Hawaii.”
BHO’s II (Barry Soetoro’s, Soebarkah’s) INS records will tell us everything. Or BHO II will have to be forced to testify under oath about his nativity.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.