Since this piece was written, it’s been reported that Judge Malihi had offered plaintiff’s counsel a default judgement prior to the hearing based upon the absence of Obama and his attorney. Not one of the three wanted to go that way as evidence against Obama’s eligibility had NEVER been presented in a court. In all previous hearings around the country it had been the judge’s decision that none of those bringing suit had “standing.”
So it appears the decision of Judge Malihi will be based on the evidence presented by each of the attorneys in the 3 unconnected suits. Deadline for additional filings with the court will be February 5th.
Doug Book
Reading some links, yesterday, after the session, I got the impression that the judge offered the plaintiffs the default judgement, but the plaintiffs wanted to enter their evidence into the record.
I took it to be some tactic that would require 0bama and his minions to respond to that evidence if they appeal or choose to move forward in some manner?
Perhaps the fine legal minds here on FR can clarify for us.