yitbos
What these idiots fail to realize is it isn’t the infidelity that bothers women about Newt. As you pointed out, it didn’t bother them about Clinton.
The difference between Clinton/Obama and Newt is that both Clinton and Obama flirt with women. They charm women. They schmooze women and give women the impression that they just might get into bed with them.
Why do you think some women on FR were fawning all over Rick Perry? It wasn’t because Perry is good at the debate, it’s because of how Perry looks.
Gingrich, on the other hand, doesn’t flirt or go out of his way to make bedroom eyes at women like Clinton and Obama did, and Newt isn’t good-looking like Perry, the Marlboro Man.
Gingrich is a Grandpa who calls it like he sees it. Women want to be romanced, they want to be wooed, they want to be fawned over. Gingrich isn’t doing that, whereas Romney is, and Obama will, and that’s why women don’t like Gingrich. At their core, they are asking themselves why Gingrich isn’t trying to get in their pants.
(Now watch, a couple of FR women will jump all over me and claim “I wasn’t fawning all over Perry”... and I’ll just say what Ron Paul said in the debate to Santorum: “I didn’t mention you by name, so I think you’re being a little overly sensitive” and defensive. But watch — it will happen.)
You're lucky it's very late on a slow Friday night. Otherwise, you would be sooooo dead right now....
yitbos
“women want to be romanced, they want to be wooed....” etc.
They ALSO want a healthy economy and some assurance
that America is not going straight to hell.
The usual dynamics from 20 years ago with Clinton, and 3 years ago with Obama could be fading very, very fast.
The Left will get their usual women voters, but there will likely be a little attrition there also.
But everything depends upon whether we’re talking about the Primaries or the General Election.
The argument against Gingrich re: the woman vote is being used to make him unelectable compared to Romney in the General Election-—that’s the only reason to invoke it.
This freeper is not going to jump all over you, a good looking man may bring a smile to ones face, but doesn’t matter when your in the voting booth unless your IQ is room temperature...just like a good looking woman brings a smile to a mans face but doesnt mean you want to marry them...
(Now watch, a couple of FR women will jump all over me and claim “I wasn’t fawning all over Perry”... and I’ll just say what Ron Paul said in the debate to Santorum: “I didn’t mention you by name,
***************************
*waves hands* ....Here I am!
I think Perry has/had the best character of all the candidates. Others may disagree but that is my opinion of the man and I think he proved himself a class act when he stepped out.
Was he good looking? I suppose so, by general standards, but that wasn’t exactly what sold me.( I kinda like the looks of Anthony Hopkins and Clint Eastwood—Perry wasn’t quite my type)
Perry is a good person and that is what I appreciate. He didn’t change an opinion to fit what others demand. If he thought something moral and right, he stood by his idea/opinion, no matter.
There is nothing on the outside to compare to the beauty of an inside job. He is a good man. That is what is attractive...his convictions and he is authentic.
I suppose Perry must be a very lucky and loved man— to have so many fuss about his good looks when his greatest asset is what is on the inside and he has a wife who looks at him so loving and adoringly. Still, after all these years.
I don’t care what people think about my support of Perry. A good man is a good man and pity those who can’t see it.
I am proud of Perry, now more than ever. He is a fine man.
But all the married conservative women I know support Newt..several dozen
on Marrianne Gingrich...what they know first is that she herself was a mistress first....
let me tell ya...hell hath no fury like a woman scorned ...at women who cheat with their men more than anything
married women see women who snag married men the way a Cobra views a Mongoose
or a Vampire views Holy Water
a visceral hatred worse more so than towards men they already knew are often weak about precisely the precious biology women have that men crave
trust me on this...wives do not brook the sorta women who troll for married men
at least not in the South
but in all this I find it funny sorta
so many folks don;t bother to marry anyhow anymore...just screw and pop out bastard kids
and does anyone really think your average meterosexual educated white boy today will ever have near the propensity to chase women like his grandfather might have?
these lads are scared of their own shadows...much less their wives
what harm can they do from the back seat of the Prius feeding the baby while their wife drives ..these little girl pants and sock capped boy-men
when I grew up most rich men had mistresses...those days are long gone...what a tempest in a teapot in today's very unmasculine world
I guess that could be true of Bill Clinton, that is when he's not raping them!
So you just think Conservative women are just plain stupid. ...nice
Gingrich, on the other hand, doesn’t flirt or go out of his way to make bedroom eyes at women like Clinton and Obama did, and Newt isn’t good-looking like Perry, the Marlboro Man.
You get my vote for stupidest post of the day.