To: Steelfish
Let's let the clean family man win for a change.
2 posted on
01/13/2012 9:45:04 PM PST by
Lazlo in PA
(Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
To: Lazlo in PA
Bravo! Newt needs to get out. He carries too much baggage and is un-telegenic. According to CNN, in S. Carolina, Newt is winning the male vote against Romney but is losing in spades the female vote to Romney.
4 posted on
01/13/2012 9:48:46 PM PST by
Steelfish
(ui)
To: Lazlo in PA
Santorum isn’t going to win this nomination and is only dividing the conservative vote.
44 posted on
01/13/2012 11:50:19 PM PST by
fortheDeclaration
(All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. Burke)
To: Lazlo in PA
Let’s let the clean family man win for a change.
Yeah, would it kill us to have a man trustworthy enough by his wife and kids as President?
50 posted on
01/14/2012 12:11:54 AM PST by
Yaelle
To: Lazlo in PA
When isn’t it the clean family man? Obama, Bush, HW Bush, Reagan, Carter, Ford, Nixon.
53 posted on
01/14/2012 12:18:14 AM PST by
ansel12
(Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
To: Lazlo in PA
Puh-leeeeze. "Clean family man." For one thing, unless you are personally and intimately familiar with the Santorum's daily life, you have not idea whether Santorum is a "clean family man" or not, and for another thing, to all appearances JIMMY CARTER was your ideal "clean family man," and so is the dangerous statist fraud Romney.
For once I find myself questioning Mark Levin's judgment for being such a Santorum fan.
Newt may be a lot of things -- a thousand times more inspiring, passionate, and eloquent than Santorum is certainly among them.
One thing Newt is NOT is sanctimonious. No one could ever call him that.
Santorum, on the other hand ...
109 posted on
01/17/2012 9:09:03 AM PST by
Finny
("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson