Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Picture at link.

Hey Panetta, you're a pansy.

1 posted on 01/12/2012 5:36:46 PM PST by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Nachum

Well, one needs to mark one’s territory. Otherwise the deer in my backyard might get uppity.


2 posted on 01/12/2012 5:41:13 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
Hey Panetta, you're a pansy.

Now that comment's below the belt. You can only attack his record. LOL!

Just kidding, Nachum.

3 posted on 01/12/2012 5:42:28 PM PST by writer33 (Mark Levin Is The Constitutional Engine Of Conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Great photo. I hope no one photoshops him pissing on a German. LOL


5 posted on 01/12/2012 5:48:12 PM PST by pennyfarmer (Even a RINO will chew its foot off when caught in a trap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

My dad’s first combat in WWII was in Patton’s Third Army crossing the Rhine.
He was put in a boat to cross the river under fire, boat #13.
He was pulled out at the last minute and another replaced him. They were cut to pieces in the crossing.

He always considered 13 to be HIS lucky number.


6 posted on 01/12/2012 5:48:17 PM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Churchill also took a whizz into the Rhine on his first crossing after D-Day.


7 posted on 01/12/2012 5:49:50 PM PST by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
Before Crossing the Rhine in March of 1945, Patton's Third Army pissed in that river before crossing and I am told, never quit pissing on enemy land and some of the enemy until the war was won. I believe the Roman's also had such a program...

They would not have allowed Patton off the 'farm' today......General Patton like many understood the "Last Rights for your enemy"!

9 posted on 01/12/2012 5:50:14 PM PST by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

There’s a difference, though, between pissing into a river and pissing on dead human bodies.


10 posted on 01/12/2012 5:50:23 PM PST by Charles Henrickson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

P!$$ on the Taliban. And the hoss they rode in on!


11 posted on 01/12/2012 5:51:22 PM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar ( P!$$ on the Taliban)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
Hey, the Rhine couldn't tell the difference.

Now, a pic of Patton pissing on a dead Kraut would be germane (that's german with an e).

20 posted on 01/12/2012 6:48:14 PM PST by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

My Father’s unit was attached to Patton’s Third for a good part of the war. We lost Dad suddenly last month. I’m just thankful that he recorded his witnessed account of Dachau.


21 posted on 01/12/2012 6:50:25 PM PST by armymarinemom (My sons freed Iraqi and Afghan Honor Roll students.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum; majormaturity; dools0007world; mrmeyer; stig
The conduct would be covered by the The Commander's Handbook on the Law of Naval Operations, as follows:

6.2.6 War Crimes under International Law

The following acts, if committed intentionally, are examples of acts that could be considered war crimes, but would not be considered grave breaches of the [Geneva] Conventions:

2. Mutilation or other mistreatment of the dead

The only question would be if this provision includes the mistreatment of non-uniformed dead combatants (such as Taliban fighters).

I am all in favor of killing the enemy. Once the enemy is dead, however, I am not in favor of desecrating the body. This view is not unique to me. This is the traditional view of civilized societies, including the United States, and it has, as far as I know, always been a part of our military code.

I expect our guys to act better than the enemy.

Of course I am much more repelled by the abominable, murderous, brutal conduct of the muzzies than I am by a few of our guys pissing on those bodies. A reprimand or some other mild form of discipline might be in order, though. What they did, while understandable emotionally to some extent, should not be condoned or excused.

24 posted on 01/12/2012 7:55:54 PM PST by Charles Henrickson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Check out Panetta’s background at www.keywiki.org. Go to “Search” box and put in his name and his “search”.
Surprise, surprise!

For those who like military history and equipment, you can find a more modern pontoon bridge in “Technical Bulletin - TB 5-271-1, Dept. of the Army Technical Bulletin, “Bridge, Floating: Raft Section, Light Tactical”, Sept. 1959.

My son (I must brag) and his company, 299th MRB (Multi-Role Bridge) Company, out of Ft. Belvoir,Va, on April 3, 2003, put up the first modern Ribbon Pontoon Bridge in combat history, and earned a Presidential Unit Citation for this action on the Euphrates River west of Baghdad.

Also included a combined amphibious assault by some of the 299th and the 54th Ordnance Company, to seize the east bank of the river and clear it, to seize the main concrete bridge for the Abrams tanks to use, and to clear it of explosives, thus allowing the rest of the company to put up the ribbon bridge (they still received enemy fire but accomplished the whole mission without any casualties).

From a proud pop.


25 posted on 01/12/2012 8:33:55 PM PST by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson