To: Former Fetus
Haig didn’t become acting president. His line, “I’m in charge here,” which I took to mean he was trying to keep things under control at the White House while Bush was traveling, was mistaken to mean he taken over. He hadn’t. Any power transfer would have been to VP Bush (I don’t recall if that was done.) Plus, the Secretary of State is fourth in line after the VP, the Speaker of the House, and the Sentate President Pro Tempore.
6 posted on
01/11/2012 10:23:31 AM PST by
Southside_Chicago_Republican
("It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged." -- G.K. Chesterton)
To: Southside_Chicago_Republican
You’re right. Of course, the MSM hyperventilated over his statement...like the hysterical morons they are!
11 posted on
01/11/2012 10:50:59 AM PST by
SMARTY
("The man who has no inner-life is a slave to his surroundings. "Henri Frederic Amiel)
To: Southside_Chicago_Republican; SMARTY
His line, Im in charge here, which I took to mean he was trying to keep things under control at the White House while Bush was traveling, was mistaken to mean he taken over. He hadnt.
Actually, he did. After the "I'm in charge" line he detailed his obsolete understanding of the order of succession. He tried to spion it later, but he got it wrong (except below). On the other hand, if one is to be wrong, keeping control away from Tip O'Neill is a good reason to be wrong.
Constitutionally, gentlemen, you have the President, the Vice President and the Secretary of State in that order, and should the President decide he wants to transfer the helm to the Vice President, he will do so. He has not done that. As of now, I am in control here, in the White House, pending return of the Vice President and in close touch with him. If something came up, I would check with him, of course.
13 posted on
01/11/2012 11:09:36 AM PST by
Dr. Sivana
(May Mitt Romney be the Mo Udall of 2012.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson