If you read the Judge's Order a couple of things stand out.
"Order the appearance of any persons necessary to settle any claims…".
"Order the appearance of any persons necessary to settle any claims completely and or order the appearance of any non-parties, including but not limited to municipal and other government officials and lien holders, that may be essential for a total resolution of the claims;".
Ok...so if this were simply a matter of failing to dot "i's" and cross "t's" will these alleged lenders be allowed to file Motions for Protective Order like they ALWAYS do?
Doing so makes it look like they trying to hide something.
I think what they are hiding is the fact that third parties via CDS have made them whole (mainly bailout bed-mate AIG); something they CAN legally do not more than once twice, not less than once never, but once. That, my friends, IS what they are hiding and how they have been unjustly enriched.
It has happened to you - whether in default or not. Your grand-children will be paying it back...and no; they won't be bailed out or receive a bonus.
The rubber will meet the road when the time comes to insure the title.
The Unholy Pig Men Alliance has some serious issues to address lest they suffer the lash of a Trial by Jury.
If a settlement takes place mustn't the mortgage must be released at closing by the current mortgage owner (who’s that?) before a new mortgage with title insurance is issued??
Specifically, if the title company is not satisfied that there is a good release on the old mortgage, won't it refuse to insure a new mortgage?
Same applies if paid in cash – still need title insurance with homeowner as named insured. No?
No title insurance means no standing means no foreclosure.
(Obligatory spam warning: Link goes to Foreclosure Hamlet. Advertising is not permitted. If you hate blogs do not click.)
Court Order embedded at link.
WELCOME BACK!
I like it ...
The lawyers in every instance know beyond a shadow of a doubt that they are filing false paper and stealing homes for a party that has no monetary interest in the property/note ... That’s why we have the Nevada Supremem Court case regarding failure to certify documents ... Lawyers in Floida routinely fail to comply with rule 1.110(b) which requires the same ...
SEND THEM TO JAIL ... or just disbarr the lot of them and leave them hanging with $200k in student loans to pay and no job.
It is tragic that this problem is so obscure that not 1% of the population has a clue what is really at stake. The real issue is not the forclosure, which is tragic, and not about the forged documents, which is fraud. The real issue is the inability to effectively transfer clear title to the property because the proper paperwork was not filed. How do you repair that after the fact?
And the issue of double payment to the property owner (if anyone can actually identify the owner) Bank, investment company, investor.
What a mess.