On December 29, 2011, Ron Paul acknowledged that he bore some responsibility for his newsletters. Fine. He said there "eight or ten bad sentences" in them. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2826496/posts
I have .pdfs of all or parts of some of his newsletters. There are more than eight or ten 'bad' sentences about blacks, jews, and gays per issue. At least, I consider these kinds of things as 'bad':
And of course the Mossad may have been responsible for the first World Trade Center bombings.
Plus, he's just nuts. Giving advice to militas on how to avoid wiretaps and select members? Those aren't bad sentences?
I could continue with "bad" sentences about how the government created AIDs, or how the government is involved in a disinformation campaign about how bad crack is for you, or about tracking you with your pink money, or about Trilateralist conspiracies, or about the international financial blackmail conspiracy that resulted in the Panama Canal treaty, or . . .
Only eight or ten bad sentences? Then he's nuts and a bigoted anti-Semite.
You realized, of course, that for some reason the people at Stormfront were supporting him again:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2826496/posts