Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Steel
There is a problem with the explanation of numbers in this article, but it does not change the validity of the charge.

Upon closer inspection, we learned that the number assigned to Virginia's birth certificate is 151-1961-01180, and realized that, statistically, that number simply cannot be legitimate.

Now, here's what's wrong with that number: we all know that the last group of numbers on the "certificate" Barack Obama claims is his official record is 10641, and his certificate was supposedly processed on August 8, 1961. We also know that the Nordyke twins were assigned the numbers 10637 and 10638, and their certificates were processed on August 11, 1961. Virginia Sunahara's birth certificate states that it was processed on August 10, 1961, but the number it was assigned is 443 higher than the Nordyke twin whose certificate was stamped with the number 10637.

Virginia's number, 01180, is not 443 higher than the twins number, it is 9457 LOWER. I can only assume the author is comparing 1180 to 637, which is actually a difference of 543, not 443. But in fact the comparison is between 1180 and 10637, a difference of 9457.

10 posted on 01/05/2012 1:51:19 PM PST by Tatze (I reject your reality and substitute my own!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Tatze

Then the “1” and the “0” are transposed.

Or “a difference of 9457” is even a more absurd difference in the document numbering by the state of Hawaii.


11 posted on 01/05/2012 2:04:17 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Tatze

They had a typo - the actual number is 011080


12 posted on 01/05/2012 2:04:38 PM PST by Ladysforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson