Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney Wins Iowa Caucus
Pundit Press ^ | 1/4/12 | Aurelius

Posted on 01/03/2012 11:27:04 PM PST by therightliveswithus

According to Karl Rove, now speaking on Fox News, a high-ranking official in the Republican party has declared that Mitt Romney has won the Iowa Caucus by exactly 14 votes.

Update- Fox News has confirmed that a second source has verified this report and that Mitt Romney has indeed won.


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: backstabberromney; backstabberrove; foxnews; iowa4backstabber; iowa4deathpanels; iowa4romneycare; iowa4romneymarriage; karlrove; romney; romneydirtytricks; rovedirtytricks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

1 posted on 01/03/2012 11:27:15 PM PST by therightliveswithus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: therightliveswithus

Enjoy your Pyrrhic Victory, Mitt.


2 posted on 01/03/2012 11:28:17 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: therightliveswithus

Not shocking, convenient how they “found” a lot of ballots at the end for Romney.


3 posted on 01/03/2012 11:29:10 PM PST by PAConservative1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: therightliveswithus

Highway robbery....


4 posted on 01/03/2012 11:29:17 PM PST by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: therightliveswithus

Enjoy your Pyrrhic Victory, Rove.


5 posted on 01/03/2012 11:30:01 PM PST by rhinohunter (Not voting for RINO Romney...no way...no how)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: therightliveswithus

Mitt outspent rick 100 to 1, or there about. The party can not afford Mitt if it takes 100 to 1 to win by 14 votes.

That means Mitt might need 100 BILLION to beat Obama.


6 posted on 01/03/2012 11:30:18 PM PST by cableguymn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: therightliveswithus

The Republican Party disgusts me.


7 posted on 01/03/2012 11:30:57 PM PST by EternalVigilance (Nutrionally, you are what you eat. Politically, you are who you endorse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: therightliveswithus

hey! Fu%k you Karl!


8 posted on 01/03/2012 11:32:05 PM PST by Carthego delenda est
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: therightliveswithus

Gotta love it when Mitts down by 4 when every precinct is counted but one in the late hours of the night and then they find those votes and he wins by 14. Probably the number of wives Joseph Smith had...haha


9 posted on 01/03/2012 11:32:44 PM PST by MacMattico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: therightliveswithus
Why is it always the statist candidate who finds the needed ballots whenever the election is close?
10 posted on 01/03/2012 11:32:58 PM PST by rhinohunter (Not voting for RINO Romney...no way...no how)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cableguymn

On the other hand, Santorum practically lived in Iowa for the past year, and went to all 99 precincts. Romney only came into Iowa for the last two weeks and blitzed it. Did pretty good for a two week heavy duty effort as opposed to Santorum who took up for all ostensible purposes, residency in Iowa. Santorum fought a good fight though, considering. I liked his speech he gave tonite. It was heartwarming.


11 posted on 01/03/2012 11:34:03 PM PST by flaglady47 (When the gov't fears the people, liberty; When the people fear the gov't, tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: flaglady47

99 counties.

There are more than 1700 precincts.


12 posted on 01/03/2012 11:35:13 PM PST by EternalVigilance (Nutrionally, you are what you eat. Politically, you are who you endorse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: therightliveswithus

Born and raised in Iowa!

Right, Mitt “won!”

So if anyone else drops out, who gets their votes? Mitt? Not no, but hell no!

Mitt has a percentage problem — 25% maximum support gets Mitt nothing; by week’s end, Santorum will surpass any lead Mitt thinks he gained from this “win” in Iowa.


13 posted on 01/03/2012 11:35:56 PM PST by Bshaw (A nefarious deceit is upon us all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: therightliveswithus

You might want to wait for the official results. Jus’ sayin’/


14 posted on 01/03/2012 11:36:31 PM PST by BenKenobi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

The magnificent Karl Rove strikes again.


15 posted on 01/03/2012 11:36:53 PM PST by Orange1998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: therightliveswithus

States should have ‘real elections’ with ONLY party members voting. These caucuses are just stupid, IMO.

Also, party members should have been members of the party for 3 months to be eligible to vote. No dems would be registering as republicans to show up and vote on the same day. This should have been done THREE YEARS ago after seeing what happened with McAmnesty. Now, here we are at it again....


16 posted on 01/03/2012 11:38:34 PM PST by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: therightliveswithus

Santorum was the big victor tonight. He has major momentum on his side. Romney didn’t do any better than his polling numbers. He didn’t win over any converts.


17 posted on 01/03/2012 11:38:49 PM PST by upsdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flaglady47

You know how he won by secret voting.


18 posted on 01/03/2012 11:39:00 PM PST by Libertynotfree (Over spending, Over taxes, and Over regulation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: therightliveswithus

This is what is called a virtual tie. Should Romney prevail in a virtual tie, the headline will be that Romney won. Should Santorum prevail in a virtual tie, the headline will be that it was a virtual tie.

The liberal media and the Democrats love Mitt — for now — the way they loved McCain four years ago. They very much want him to be the nominee because they know he is not electable.


19 posted on 01/03/2012 11:39:15 PM PST by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carthego delenda est

Yep. Rove had on his smug little smirk.

Go Rick Santorum!


20 posted on 01/03/2012 11:39:40 PM PST by unkus (Silence Is Consent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson