Posted on 01/03/2012 11:23:28 AM PST by Red Steel
Have you checked your recycle bin? Maybe you could go back to a restore point from a couple of days ago.
Thank YOU!
Or do a search for our .pst file and make sure the date is in the past.
Proving your an NBC should be as simple as picking your nose, and Obama can't do it!
ping to LucyT & Hoosiermama
Write a vanity “article” asking for tech help. Other people do that and seem to get help. That way more people will see it.
I'm pretty sure Nancy Pelosi and the other rats who directly attested to his eligibility, as well as the beltway pubbies and sycophant pressitutes who pooh-poohed this issue, will insist. They want the whole thing to just disappear down the memory hole like it never happened. Too bad Al Gore invented the internet.
For later.
Yeah, I noticed that “abstract” thing...
The caveat on that form was amazing, basically saying “This is a true copy of a collection of information on file...”
A collection of information, probably not from the same source...
A collection of information, probably not even FROM THE SAME PEOPLE!!!
You get what you pays for, eh?
Check Hoosier-Daddy’s comment.
This is an encouraging circumstance, but no one should be holding their breath for any urf-shattering upset at the White Crib. Erich "The Coward" Holder and the Just Us Department could weigh in.
Article II SUPER PAC DOES NOT FUND THE LAWSUIT, IT IS JUST FOR EDUCATION. PLEASE SEND DONATIONS TO THE ATTORNEYS: HATFIELD, IRION AND TAITZ
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Don't get too excited. We'll hit a roadblock at the "conservative-leaning" Supreme Court. Count on it.
Take it to the USSC to allow Obama to not have to show his LFBC to qualify and not have to explain why his “father” being a British Subject making Obama ineligibile doesn’t apply to “The Won”?
I’m not even sure Wasserman-Schultz would buy it.
I am pretty excited about this - AFAIK it is the first time the motions to dismiss have failed. (and boy were they lame.)
If there is discovery - its over. If the USSC has to decide again on NBC definition - it is a horserace, but Minor Vs. Heppersett gives the good guys the lead.
I am pretty excited about this - AFAIK it is the first time the motions to dismiss have failed. (and boy were they lame.)
If there is discovery - its over. If the USSC has to decide again on NBC definition - it is a horserace, but Minor Vs. Heppersett gives the good guys the lead.
(ping to David - opinion?)
Hawaii doesn't dictate what proof is good for NBC qualifications.
They can send a Teapot, a Hammer, or BC that's a pile of crap, but is that proof of NBC? If it's the PDF, definitely not.
If that PDF BC gets into a court room, and it's pulled apart and proved to be fraudulent, people are setting themselves up for legal peril.
Who on “Team Obama” is going to vouch for that cut and paste photo-shop garbage in a court room?
Great news, I read into it that the judge here gave standing by specifically saying “The Plaintiffs are voters”. This is pretty significant. I think this needs to go viral, if possible. Ibelieve the more exposure this gets the less chance of this Judge disappearing or pulling a Vince Foster impersonation, Happy Day here at FR
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.