[CainConservative]

Paultards to Mitt-bots

It is my opinion that resorting to this kind of meaningless labeling

Hmmmm.... I think Paultard and Mitt-bott is pinpoint, PRECISE, accurate, fact based, fair labeling of those two weirdo groups. In other words, it sums them up.

[Norm Lenhart]

I am reminded of the southern phrase “Hit dog howls”.

Can someone explain the difference between Democrats demanding respect for their liberal politics and politicians and so called conservatives demanding respect for their favored liberal politics and politicians?

Words mean things whether libs like it or not and as you pointed out, they are dead on. Mitt fans run around parroting liberal Romney talking points like they had a CD in their heads, never questioning the reality of his positions - quite robot like. Paul supporters show retarded (as in slow/held back/not up to speed) devotion, parroting his craziness and logicless positions on most issues.

Yup, shoe fits. People not liking the associations are free to alter their positions.

[fr_freak]

Hmmmm.... I think Paultard and Mitt-bott is pinpoint, PRECISE, accurate, fact based, fair labeling of those two weirdo groups. In other words, it sums them up.

Oh, you must be one of those Caintard Herman-bots.


(relax - I like Cain, wish he was still running)