To: itsahoot
No, I am not advocating taking affirmative steps to end someone’s life. I am advocating a reasonable cost vs. benefits analysis on the use of treatments that were not available 10, 20, 30 years ago, because we cannot allow or afford to treat everyone to the full extent of medical technology regardless of cost.
To: Wallop the Cat; itsahoot; wagglebee
No, I am not advocating taking affirmative steps to end someones life. I am advocating a reasonable cost vs. benefits analysis on the use of treatments that were not available 10, 20, 30 years ago, because we cannot allow or afford to treat everyone to the full extent of medical technology regardless of cost. Actually, you're advocating for putting a dollar value on a human life.
Human life cannot and should not be simply reduced to $$$$$$'s.
Advocating for a cost vs. benefit analysis puts you solidly in the pro-death, euthanasia camp.
45 posted on
12/31/2011 3:53:11 PM PST by
metmom
(For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson