Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: traditional1
Simple

What you describe is anything BUT simple. Each candidate now has to run the equivalent of a general election campaign AND with the financial restrictions you've created. How are they going to do that? By going out and getting more smaller donations. OK, how are they going to do THAT?

Also, your plan reminds me of the South Park underwear gnomes--"Simply make everyone only give $2300 donations, and have the candidates run in fifty states, and presto, we have a final candidate who's of the people, not the establishment," or whatever.

What are you going to do to the political parties who will give their support to individual candidates (like, uh, Romney, whose support by the establishment, I am guessing, has you thinking about this, at least in part)? With candidates relying on smaller donations, and with no bundling and McCain-Feingold-like restrictions on freedom of people to organize and pool their own money (those evil PACS), all that's happened is that the same monied interests will donate from individuals who make up those interests--which is what they do NOW.

Your solution is no solution at all. It makes the problem worse because you're having these smaller candidates spreading themselves so thin across the country instead of focusing their limited resources on ONE primary at a time, where they can get the most bang for their limited buck.

How does your way make anything better, instead of giving us one candidate who emerges from this fifty-primary day a winner--and that winner will be the one who is best because....?

Welcome to Italy.

26 posted on 12/30/2011 5:19:51 AM PST by Darkwolf377 (Is it really time to go?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Darkwolf377

Exactly. That sort of unconstitutional free speech limitations are complicated and something liberals (and that fat rino who was head of senate centrist coalition, fred something) have been trying to achieve fir years. If I have money, why shouldn’t I have the right to buy ad and say positive things about some issue or candidate?

Having some government official checking whether my ad is political, is big government policy and unconstitutional.

I vaguely renember Newt supported this.


30 posted on 12/30/2011 5:28:07 AM PST by heiss (heartless and inhumane (radical rightwinger))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: Darkwolf377
LOL Seems that in 1800, they had no problems. Isn't technology grand?

Buying candidates through corporate and special interest bundling gets us the Socialist/RINO country we have.

You wanna keep it that way, I guess.

41 posted on 12/30/2011 6:01:10 AM PST by traditional1 (Free speech for me.....not for thee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson